Posted by:
pewsitter
(
)
Date: August 15, 2013 03:07PM
There is a tread about women wearing their bras over or under their garments and a bishop taking away the woman's temple recommend because she wears her bra next to her skin.
I would think before a bishop would be allowed to take a temple recommend away from a women because of were the bra is worn, the bishop would have to have proof the woman did not follow his instructions over a period of time. Does this require visual inspections? Does he have to check and make sure his fingers feel skin, garments, bra in that order? Is this a normal part of a temple recommend for women to have their breast examined? What happens if the woman had breast enlargement? Would the Bishop have to hold a court of love? Would he need to inspect her breast?
This sound so strange but somehow believable. Why do women put up with such perverts?