Posted by:
doubtisavirtue
(
)
Date: October 09, 2013 03:12AM
I don't think there *is* a single overarching purpose to life in general. "Purpose" implies intent. It implies someone set it out that way for a reason. When we talk about the "purpose" of a car, or the "purpose" of a fork, we're really talking about the intention behind its existence, what it was designed for.
Given that I'm a naturalist, I don't think there's a God up there defining what our "purpose" is.
As such, if we have a purpose, it's because we *decide* to have a purpose, and what that purpose is. *We* intend certain missions in life.
My purpose in life, for instance, is education. My own, and others. That's the purpose I chose. To see the world made better by an improved understanding. Perhaps someday that mission will be replaced by another one. But for now, that's my purpose.
I remember hearing Richard Dawkins talking some time ago about some work done by a group of psychologists. When shown things like rocks with rough edges, when kids below a certain age were asked if those rocks were that way because of some natural process, or because they helped animals scratch themselves when they were itchy, they favored the purpose driven "so they can scratch themselves" explanation. Beyond a certain age, however, they favored a process driven explanation for the shape of the rock.
In other words, at an early point in their development, they inferred intent behind the shape of the rock where none existed, and later on they did not. That's my view of the "purpose of life". We have a natural inclination to think of things in terms of the intentions of others, because we are social beings. That's probably why people invent gods to begin with.
But that's not always appropriate, because not everything in the universe *is* driven by purpose. Volcanos don't appear to be driven by purpose, for instance. A bank however, has a purpose. Again, the difference lies in intent.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/09/2013 03:17AM by doubtisavirtue.