Posted by:
Bob..not registered
(
)
Date: October 20, 2010 03:18PM
The church went through a big change in the 60s, and continued it through the 70s, and now they've cemented their position.
The first change was correlation. Before correlation, the church allowed people to think for themselves, prepare their own lessons and "be led by the spirit" to the extent they believed in such things.
The next change was in the 70s, when the church took a stand against the equal rights amendment. They had a very clever and effective political strategy, and have played off of that with regard to same sex marriage politics.
The result of these changes has been that only the most militant mormons remain in the church. As a result, the leadership of the church is the most militant of the militant...etc.
So, all of the current apostles and the 1st presidency have been in leadership positions through these changes. They've been scared of things like Sunstone, Dialogue, and now the Internet. They've weathered the storm by marginalizing anyone on the margins. If you voice a question about the church, you'll never be bishop or relief society president. If you don't make that rank, you won't be an SP or GA.
Ultimately, this was a very smart choice for the church. They drew a line in the sand, and maintained the ranks of the real believers. There other choice would have been horrible for church revenues, and etc.
For example, if they had welcomed all to the fold, the doubters and nay-sayers would have eventually forced a logical approach on the church. Many of the core doctrines, like priesthood, BoM and prophets would have been undermined. The people remaining would be like Quakers or RLDS...people who want to live their lives well, in a community, but without the commitment to tithing, missions, or church leadership that the church enjoys today.
The church chose the right strategy.
Now, I cannot figure out why anyone would be in the church...but there are plenty of militant mormons who simply don't want to look outside the box.
The church is strong, as a result. It would have become weak, had it been open to other ideas.