Posted by:
zenmaster
(
)
Date: July 29, 2014 04:28PM
I've been thinking a lot about the Book of Abraham in the past months and it's implications for the Church. It is no mystery to most people in this forum that the BOA has some serious issues. Joseph Smith's translation (or lack of it) of the BOA has been proven to be way off (not even in the ballpark) by numerous prominent Egyptologists. This finding is what started my serious questioning of JS as a translator and has been the catalyst of my own personal deconstruction of the whole LDS faith.
Of course the well publicized essay came out recently regarding the translation of the BOA. The Church began to step away from the literal "by his own hand on papyrus" paradigm--a literal translation documents personally written by Abraham.
There is also debates in many forums about the possibility of a de-canonization of the BOA. In my opinion, de-canonization of the BOA absolutely CANNOT happen and here is why:
(from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Abraham)
"The Book of Abraham text is a source of some distinct Latter-day Saint doctrines such as the exaltation of humanity,[14] the plurality of gods,[15] priesthood,[16] pre-mortal existence,[17] and the existence of other inhabited worlds in the cosmos.[18] The Book of Abraham also contains the only reference in the Latter-day Saint canon to the star Kolob, which, according to the text, is the star closest to where God lives.[19]"
If the BOA is de-canonized, the LDS Church would lose much doctrine that makes it a unique religion (Plan of Salvation and the creation of the world are a couple of major ones).
Losing the BOA would essentially make the LDS Church just another Protestant religion and the leaders would lose much of their authority.
What do you think?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/29/2014 04:29PM by zenmaster.