Posted by:
RPackham
(
)
Date: August 04, 2014 10:46AM
For several years I have been writing an opinion column for our local newspaper on alternate Sundays. This was the column I wrote for July 27:
==========
One of the "big" questions we sometimes ask is: What is the purpose of this life?
The question is a very good one. However, it implies - by the very fact that it is asked - that there IS an inherent purpose for our existence, and that we need to find out what that purpose is. But why should we assume that there is a purpose? It seems to be a common assumption, especially among believers in God or the "supernatural", that everything happens or exists for a purpose. But there is no demonstrable basis for such an assumption.
Many things obviously exist without any inherent purpose. For example, if I find a hundred-dollar bill in the street, I don't ask "What is the purpose of this money?" It is the purest accident that it is there. I may (assuming there is no way to find its owner) create a "purpose" for it, by spending it, but that purpose is merely one that I have assigned to it myself, not any purpose that was inherent in it, or that had anything to do with its lying there on the street.
If I win a raffle where the prize is a two-week trip to London, do I ask "What is the purpose of spending two weeks in London?" Whatever inherent purpose it may have can only be expressed in the vaguest of terms: to be in London for a while. Anything beyond that is a purpose that I assign to it. If someone presumes to tell me: "Well, the purpose of being in London for two weeks is to visit all the historical sites there and to become familiar with English history", I would object that there are many other possible ways to spend the time, and that suggestion is by no means the only one or even the best one. It might be better to shop, to go to the theater, to walk around observing Londoners, to spend time in the pubs and restaurants, etc.
So, for someone to tell me that the purpose of my existence here on earth is something like "to have a chance to be saved" or "to learn to reject this existence as worldly and evil" or "to pass a test that God told me to give you" or anything similar, seems presumptuous to me, like telling me how to spend my hundred dollars or my time in London.
What is the purpose of the whale, or the tulip, or the eagle, or the mountain? Some parts of nature we humans can make some use of, even if only to admire them for their beauty, their power, their complexity, or their mystery. But that is only the product of our own minds, and does not reflect any inherent "purpose." They simply exist. They exist simply for the purpose of existing. And I am no different. I also exist, and that is also my purpose: to exist.
All living things have that purpose built into their genes: to exist, to survive as long as possible, and to reproduce their kind if possible. For us humans, we also want to make our existence as pleasant and painless as possible, which implies (since we are social animals) getting along with others of our kind. All moral codes developed by human beings are attempts to guide us in doing that.
Does such a view make life less meaningful? On the contrary, I find that it makes this life the most precious thing we have, to be used and enjoyed NOW, to the fullest. It's your hundred-dollar bill. It's your two weeks in London. It's your life. It's up to you to decide how you can use it best. You have to give it a "purpose" yourself, because, until you do, it has no purpose at all.