Posted by:
ificouldhietokolob
(
)
Date: October 02, 2014 05:36PM
rgg Wrote:
> I asked for links to peer reviews and your
> response was a brush of generalities and opinions.
> I am NOT talking about religion or dogma.
>
> And who is "they" you keep referring to. Please
> share your sources.
What you asked for was this:
"Please post the links to the peer reviews where science has proven that they know where conciseness comes from. I'd like to see that!"
I never made a claim that "they [science] know where conciseness [consciousness] comes from." What I said was that there's no evidence there's anything supernatural about it, and that all the evidence we do have shows it's produced by a brain.
You were given topics to look up, which will lead you to the (literally) hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed papers in various sciences with evidence that consciousness is produced by a functioning phyiscal brain. There isn't "one" paper that "proves" it, and no one link that "proves" it either. If you're too lazy to go read all the papers showing evidence, that's your issue, not mine.
If you want a decent summary, I'd suggest this one:
http://www.amazon.com/Phantoms-Brain-Probing-Mysteries-Human/dp/0688172172Though there has been a lot of new work/evidence since he wrote it.
You used "they" referring to "science" -- then castigated me for doing the same with regard to "believers." In case there was any question, ONE of the "they" I was referring to was you.