Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: demoneca ( )
Date: December 04, 2014 06:56PM

I have a question concerning the Old Testament.

There was a city God destroyed in th OT. All in the city was wicked, including babies and children, since that includes everyone. I don't remember them being spared. Not sure if this was the same city the virgins were taken either. If I remember correctly, these people were given a few hundred years to absolve their wickedness, but they didn't, so their genocide was righteous.

Today, like always, other atrocities happen. I was talking with my devout Christian cousin about the horrible things that happen in the world to individuals, many of which the afflicted had no control over. He basically said God takes an evil situation and brings good out of it. I agree in trying to make the most out of a bad situation...but this is on an entirely different plane of bad. Some things are obstacles in life, others are just damaging. The two are very different.

Anyway, why didn't God try to salvage the good out of the children, babies, and some of the women ("property" only gets so much choice)? Is it because these people would always continue to live in wickedness, so there was no point in saving a culture that would continue to spiral into doom? Saving the kids wasn't an option because they may decide as adults to restart their original heritage one day?

I'm genuinely curious and stumped. Since the Bible was written in a corrupt world by imperfect people, what do you think was the thought process behind the decision to kill off both innocent and immoral people in the OT city? I realize I can only speculate, but there has to be a darn good reason for the justification. I will be mildly surprised if there isn't.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: nonsequiter ( )
Date: December 04, 2014 07:31PM

Conclusion? The bible was written by a group of zealots.

Black and white thinking only gets you so far.

When everyone is either good or bad and nothing else... we most easily fit the bill for bad.

Why didn't god try to salvage the good out of the children babies and some of the women? Why just those three groups? Why not some of then men too? Or are we assuming ALL the men were bad?

That's what black/white thinking does...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: poopstone ( )
Date: December 04, 2014 08:12PM

I was thinking about this very question myself today as well. There are occasional tragedies in life that I don't see how they can be made right by even God. (Enron, Rape, Bear River Massacre etc...).

Years ago I met a women who's face was shattered and destroyed by a flying rock that was flown off a lumber truck in Florida. She was so disfigured I had trouble talking to her. She wasn't bitter, she kept living.

Job was a good man and I think he has the answer. The scripture admits that the lord is cruel, that the wicked prosper, Jobs friends are kinder than god is. This isn't touchy feel good "Joel Ostein" religion you hear these days. IN the end of the story when the Lord shows up in the world wind he refuses to answer. There is no answer, but Job still believes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **  **     **  **    **   ******    ******   
       **   **   **    **  **   **    **  **    **  
       **    ** **      ****    **        **        
       **     ***        **     **        **   **** 
 **    **    ** **       **     **        **    **  
 **    **   **   **      **     **    **  **    **  
  ******   **     **     **      ******    ******