Posted by:
AnonNow
(
)
Date: February 12, 2015 01:47AM
Since you are posting at this site, I will consider that you are of LDS background, but currently having a faith crisis of some sort.
There is a logical progression in Mormon theology that I believe suggests a safe course of action for folks such as yourself. I will begin with the premise that two foundational LDS teachings are true, and then logically proceed to a surprising conclusion of what *must* be true as result, if these two premises are indeed true. And doing so will also suggest a safe course of action for yourself.
The premises are these:
1. As stated by Parley Pratt, "men, god, and angels are of the same species". And as stated by Lorenzo Snow, "as man is, god once was, and as god is, man may become". This is a foundational LDS teaching.
2. As taught by *numerous* LDS GA's over the course of many, many decades, there is no such thing as "Ex-nihilo Creation". Google this if you do not know what it means, but it basically means that there is no magic "Harry Potter Magic Wand" that creates blessings, or anything else, out of thin air. This also is a foundation LDS teaching.
Now, if these two premises are true, it necessarily means that whether in heaven, or on earth, all blessings that are created must be created by people, because it leaves no other mechanism for their creation. In other words, even if "blessings are poured upon your head from heaven", it still means that one or more of the *people* in heaven created the blessing and gave it to you.
If the two premises are true, even God is but a heavenly man, as is Jesus. So even if Jesus gives you a blessing of any kind, it still means that one or more people had to create the blessing first.
That conclusion *must* be true if the two premises it rests on are true. Similarly, if the conclusion is false, then one or more of the two premises are false.
And we can take it further...
Since, according to this conclusion, everything is ultimately created by people (whether those people are in heaven or on earth), then it necessarily follows that any idea, principle, or doctrine that can help people here on this earth must also be able to help people in heaven. And the converse is true-- i.e., if the idea, principle, or doctrine has no intrinsic value to the people here on this earth, independent of any idea or consideration of heaven, then it similarly has no intrinsic value to the people in heaven.
If it works there (in heaven), then it should at least have a theoretical foundation to be able to work here (on earth), and if it doesn't work here, it won't have any value there either.
In other words, you can evaluate the efficacy of an idea, principle, or doctrine, purely from the point of view of the question "how can that idea be a benefit to the people here on this earth, independent of any idea of heaven?"
I call this test the "Value Test".
And the Value Test *must* be a legitimate test if the two premises it rests on are true.
Now, here is where it gets interesting... since the Value Test posits that any idea, principle, or doctrine can be safely evaluated solely from it's theoretical ability to benefit society here on the earth, independent of heaven, exactly how does this evaluation differ from the evaluation that an atheist would make?
Think about it.
The bottom line that I would say to you is to use your critical thinking skills, and evaluate everything from within the construct of how it may, or may not, benefit society here on this earth, independent of any idea of heaven. Even if you believe in heaven, if the two premises above are true, then anything that has no theoretical societal value here similarly would have no societal value to the people in heaven.
And in that way you can filter out most of the superstitions.
Nevin Pratt
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/12/2015 01:49AM by nevinpratt.