Posted by:
melissa3839
(
)
Date: April 01, 2011 09:02PM
It was nice of you to be good to them. I support the idea that "Just because other people have a different opinion, doesn't mean its a bad thing for them, or that we have to be mean to them".
I still believe in God, because a lot of anti-religion arguments I hear are mostly just disagreeing with the historical accounts of the bible (was the earth created in 7 days, or in 4.5 billion years?).
But people tend to forget-- there are other versions of the story, besides just the Bible's version of God and earth's history. And other possibilities. I do not agree that "If science proves true, then God does not". Hell, he may very well be an extremely big and intelligent scientist himself! Our whole universe may just be a science experiment he's doing, kind of the way we do with cells and things, under microscopes. It doesn't have to be mystical and magical. There are plenty of possibilities. God could very well be science-based. He could have had the brains to get this universe going, the same way WE have the brains to perform surgery, mix chemicals for a certain reaction, or put an atomic bomb together. He could very well be every bit as physical and real as we are, but the reason we cannot "see" him, is for the same reason an atom in the center of your liver cannot "see" you.
We may think that "a god" sounds too much like a fairy tale, or like hocus pocus magic... But I would really compare that mentality to how people from the medieval era would look at a TV and a remote control, and see it as "magic" or "witchcraft". They only reason they see it that way, is because they don't understand it.
Well, same thing-- maybe God seems "magical" and ridiculous, because humans don't understand the immensely complex scientific mechanics behind him. I'm talking the kind of science that would make even the brightest human minds look like a parasite's intelligence, compared to a human genius!
I'm still nice to missionaries, even though I don't believe the LDS church is the only truth.
Saying "there is no evidence for God" is like that same little atom somewhere in the center of your liver, saying "There is no evidence for humans". And God trying to prove his existence to us, is like us trying to prove our existence to that little atom. Not only is it too small to see anything we would show it, but it doesn't have the capacity to understand anything we would try to relate to it.
Edited 8 time(s). Last edit at 04/01/2011 09:23PM by melissa3839.