Posted by:
BeenThereDunnThatExMo
(
)
Date: April 11, 2011 05:07PM
...such as the veracity of proving a paternity case and other similar scenarios.
Why does Moronism get to choose which DNA science and its utilization it will believe and then simply deep-6 other DNA science such as Simon Southerton's???
OK...so here's a hypothetical...
An escaped con and former arsonist burns down the local Stake President's house during a robbery. CSI finds said arsonist's DNA splattered all over the house.
With incredible DNA odds proving that said arsonist is the culprit the State Corrections facility offers to pay for all costs associated with the Stake President's home and insurance since said arsonist escaped from their facility if the Stake President agrees with the DNA findings and evidence.
Since the Stake President refutes the DNA evidence that shreds the BOM how can he bless this DNA evidence that proves nearly beyond a shadow of a doubt that said arsonist was responsible for torching his house???
Is my story-case flawed?
Are there different levels of exactness in DNA science?
Or is DNA science...DNA science...DNA science...?
Or so it seems to me...