Posted by:
elderolddog
(
)
Date: July 30, 2015 10:05PM
I'm watching the Smithsonian channel because there's nothing good on the Golf Channel and I never watch the news...
In 9 AD three Roman Legions were set up for ambush while heading for their winter quarter in Germania. 15,000 to 20,000 Romans lost their lives in this one extended battle, in the middle of a primeval forest. No altars were built, nothing was erected to mark the spot of this decisive battle.
But record of the battle reached Rome within 10 days of battle, via the few survivors who escaped the victors. It is in Roman history and Rome never tried to mess with Germania again.
Naturally, archaeologists were interested in finding the site. And they did! Here's what it says in Wikipedia:
"The finds at Kalkriese, where, along with 6,000 pieces (largely scraps) of Roman equipment, there is only one single item – part of a spur – that is clearly Germanic, indicate minimal Germanic losses."
Obviously the point I want to make is that in 9 AD, a battle involving at most 50,000 individuals, out in the middle of NO WHERE!, resulted in the discovery of not only the site, but over 6,000 pieces of Roman equipment. How does this contrast with the battle that occurred near the Hill Cumorah, 600 years later, involving literally (if you can call the BofM literature) millions of combatants and hangers-on, but which left zero, ZERO, artifacts?
Yes, yes, I know, Satan hid them all, hoping to fool people like me. Well, it worked...