Posted by:
Book of Mordor
(
)
Date: December 06, 2015 06:02PM
As far as deacons being ordained at 12, "modern" would be after Brigham Young's death. But the fully regimented advancement machine wasn't put into place until 1909.
William Hartley, "The Priesthood Reform Movement, 1908-1922," BYU Studies, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Winter 1973), p. 142:
"But before appropriate lessons could be written for each quorum, the [General Priesthood] Committee [on Outlines, established by Joseph F. Smith in 1906] found it necessary to establish age groupings for the lesser priesthood. After 1877 it had been customary in the Church for boys at age twelve to be ordained deacons. But standard age practices for ordaining teachers or priests, or for advancing young men through the priesthood were lacking. The Committee therefore suggested specific ages at which specific Aaronic Priesthood ordinations should occur. Bishops were then instructed by the Presiding Bishopric to advance boys when worthy,
"'…and unless there are special reasons to the contrary they should be advanced in the priesthood from deacon to teacher and from teacher to priest. There can be no set age when persons should be ordained to the various offices in the Aaronic Priesthood, but we suggest that as near as circumstances will permit boys be ordained as follows: Deacons at twelve, Teachers at fifteen and Priests at eighteen years of age.' [Presiding Bishopric, Circular Letter File, 1 January 1909.]
"The Committee's proposals were introduced and approved at October [1909] General Conference, then at special priesthood conventions in November and December in every stake in the Church."
George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth, Vol. 1, p. 242:
"…There is no impropriety whatever in young men, even as early as at the age of twelve or fourteen years, acting as Deacons. They receive a training that is very valuable to them, and we know of many who have been and are greatly benefited by acting in this position, meeting with the Deacons' quorum and receiving such instructions as are proper to be imparted to them in this capacity… (Jan. 15, 1899, Juvenile Instructor 34:48-9)
Cannon's JI piece was in response to a question about the verse from Timothy. He said, in effect, that the situations weren't at all alike. What a surprise.