Posted by:
bona dea
(
)
Date: April 25, 2011 07:57PM
Little nevermo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bona Dea:
>
>
http://www.nazarethmyth.info/>
> Sorry, no such evidence supporting has been
> presented in a peer-reviewed format, nor even
> formally in the scientific community. Any
> evidence from the original find has been covered
> up already and not available for scrutiny.
>
> Paul's only interaction with the "Christ" was only
> through a vision. All of his writings point to a
> spiritual persona and not a physical being. Maybe
> you have heard of the terms "Paulianity" vs. the
> teachings of Jesus. The conflict in many
> passages. Paul's supposed interactions with the
> Apostles were not written by him and are part of
> the questionable "histories" recorded in the
> gospels and the Acts of the Apostles, written much
> later.
>
> Again, it could go either way; there may or may
> not have been an actual, physical Jesus. But if
> there was, the actual facts surrounding his life
> are non-existent.
I can't find the link on Nazareth but it was widely reported at the time and seemed pretty official.I disagree about Paul. It is possible you are right, but I do not see the evidence.
Correction, I did find the link.
http://www.facingthechallenge.org/nazareth.phpEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/25/2011 08:06PM by bona dea.