Posted by:
WatchmanWatcher
(
)
Date: March 18, 2016 08:57PM
Has anyone else noticed the Crying Man Fad in the Church?
Once in while a pioneering idea comes along that needs time to incubate before it can really take off. Usually it needs to be further developed and perfected by a master before it can go viral.
Take “The Running Man,” for example. Although first performed back in 1978 by Fela Kuti's back-up dancer (and ex-wife) in Berlin (see time stamp 9:25-9:45 of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMGWx6DjMkU), it would be left to MC Hammer to polish it and really make it required study for all would-be street dancers (see 1:02-1:06 and 2:05-2:09 of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo).
“The Crying Man” fad in the LDS church was first performed by Bruce R. McConkie in 1985 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qn7boTBtn3w), but it was Henry B. Eyring who mastered it and has made it a required part of the repertoire of all powerful and upwardly mobile priesthood leaders (the other part of the repertoire being wealth, of course; after all, “What greater witness can you have” of a man's piety “than from the market?”)
Howard W. Hunter said, “I get concerned when it appears that strong emotion or free-flowing tears are equated with the presence of the Spirit.” (Preach My Gospel) Ever since Bruce R. McConkie's last testimony with Crying Man at the end, too many of you apostles seem to think that sobbing and choking is the mark of piety. Some of you (first prize goes to Henry B. Eyring) are worse than the most gaudy televangelists -- “of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men" to be righteous. “They have their reward.” You're setting an example for brothers in the Church to copy; this sobbing is really taking over in my ward. Some of the brothers with inferior acting skill are downright embarrassing. I've seen this theatrical tactic worn out so much on Sundays that I can't even enjoy a good Hollywood drama anymore without cringing. [I'd rather see the Running Man attempted by some white-bread klutz.] The only motivation I can see for it is that they're itching to get noticed and move up in the church. I know about being moved to tears, but the sentences they're crying over ARE NOT MOVING; they are the most trite, mundane, canned, and worn clichés we've ever yawned at. They make a mockery of sacred things and insult the congregations' intelligence (some of them).
Apostles, instead of pandering to passion like consumer advertising does to get rash impulse buying, why not take a chance and let people just listen to your words, and rely on the Holy Spirit to testify of truth, if there be any. Do you have to wait for God to come down and tell you to stop crying, and then you'll stop? If you're touched so easily, do you cry and choke up in your weekly apostles' meetings? If not, how do you face the other apostles, knowing that they know you only want to act it out in front of a large crowd like at General Conference? You're devaluing other legitimately moving speeches whose content, rather than gimmickry, move people to tears. The definition of Priestcraft is when people preach and set themselves up as a “light to the world that they may get gain and praise of the world; they do not seek the welfare of Zion” (see also “Televangelist”). GA's, apostles, and all of the above: Please do us all a favor and cool it with the priestcraft.
I'd like to see a collage of all of the choking and sniveling by the worst offenders. When done, please post the link to your work in the comment section below. Thank you.