Posted by:
MCR
(
)
Date: April 04, 2016 01:29PM
No. No. You've got it absolutely backwards. The life of a dog is infinitely better than the life of a wolf. Socially, too. Wolves form packs, with a tight hierarchy that lets only the top wolves breed and exposes all wolves--both within and without the pack--to a high risk of being executed by their own packmates or, especially, outsiders. They experience a high probability of being murdered before old age. It's like being in a gang.
Dogs, on the other hand, are domesticated, which means they're highly tolerant. Biologists say they don't form packs. They form loose "groups," and they rarely kill one another.
Organizations like Mormonism exist to prove to everyone that the power to be happy exists within each person, and each person can bring it out. Being tolerant, like dogs, rather than insecure and reactionary like wolves, promotes a happy life. Learning that Mormonism is full of BS--the priesthood doesn't exist,and it doesn't exist for Mormons or for anyone else either--is the point of Mormonism.
Oaks, himself, said that God doesn't intervene. Agency is all there is. Therefore, don't pray for God to intervene. It's a waste of time. Oaks--the prophet--said so. Use your agency. Don't rely on priesthood power. God won't intervene, whether you're a priest or not. Use your agency.
Thanks, Oaks. You just explained how your organization means nothing. There is no "loyal opposition." There is only obedience to the hierarchy. Yet, God doesn't intervene; so, what's the point? Why be a wolf and expose yourself to an intolerant pack heirarchy which further exposes you to being slaughtered by other wolves, including your own packmates? Why not be a tolerant dog, among other tolerant dogs, and live a long, healthy, and happy life; since, only your own agency makes the difference anyway. God's staying completely out of it. After all, He created wolves and dogs, why should He favor one over the other?
Oaks rendered his own organization obsolete. Similar organizations exist for the same reason: to demonstrate their obsolesence, so that people can learn to live free.