Posted by:
xcam
(
)
Date: April 19, 2016 08:29AM
I don't know why it's assumed that it doesn't meet the legal definition.
No one can tell me that LDS doesn't do everything in its power to "cause other emotional distress." They will use "third parties" to hound you, split your marriage, remove children - all if you don't do what they tell you to do, which includes giving them your money. They are a complete nightmare of a "date."
This one is for Utah, but the site has links for all of the States:
https://victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/stalking-resource-center/stalking-laws/criminal-stalking-laws-by-state/utahThey DO stalk members. They are so bold as to put the instructions on their site. As a side note, they would have to admit that the afterlife is "not a real threat" as a defense. It doesn't matter, in any case. It's the threat - the attempted emotional distress - that they employ in an attempt to control people -and those persons' family members- who have told them "No."
"No" means "no." I see no exemption for a religious entity, one that is trying to control a person's behavior, right down to his or her sexual behavior and alliances.
That no one has filed a complaint doesn't speak to the legality of their actions, but to the fear of their might. They threaten and cause harm to lives when you try to end the relationship. It's exactly why the law exists. Freedom of choice.
It could also be argued that they use these threats in attempts to deny civil liberties - freedom of association, press, religion. Violation of a person's civil liberties causes "emotional distress."
It applies to people who have told them "no contact."