Posted by:
NormaRae
(
)
Date: August 17, 2016 11:09AM
Exactly. Our small church, about the size of an average Mormon ward, pays a full-time minister, and part time director of religious education, music director and office administrator. We have our building paid off but have the utilities, upkeep, office supplies, kitchen supplies, activities, etc.
Our main source of income is a pledge drive, once-a-year auction (mostly we sell parties, events and services), plate donations and endowments. And at that, once a month we send our plate donations out the door to a local charity chosen by our Social Justice committee. We have to pay the larger church association a certain fee for each member in order to avail ourself of their services and association benefits.
The thing I like the most, besides the fact that it's all transparent and members have access to the financial reports, is that when working out what you want to pledge, they have a form to help you (you don't have to use it). But the first thing it does is have you list your take home income and deduct things like medical and educational expenses from it. Then it has some other things you should take into consideration. When you have a basic income worked out, you can choose what level you want to pledge at (2%, 5%, 10%). There is nothing that a sustainer level person gets that a full-tither doesn't and no one knows what level you pledge at. All they ask is that if you want to be a member, you make at least enough of a pledge to cover your footprint--which is what they have to pay to the association plus a little extra, at least $20/month.
Having a pledge drive really gives people a chance to decide what the church means in their life, and encourages them to push themselves a little, but not to overextend their family to support the church. I have seen them tell people who made a pledge and then fell on a hard time (lost job, illness, etc.) during the year, that they should revise their pledge for the rest of the year to lower it. They build in about 10% shrinkage into the budget anyway of people who don't meet their pledges. If the LDS church HAS TO base worthiness for temple recommends on how much you pay, they could base it on whether you fulfill your pledge. They could make people meet with the bishop once a year for the yearly guilt trip so they could put pressure on people to pledge more. That would work with the majority of them. But they should still let the members make the final decision with understanding that young families probably won't be able to make as big a percentage of their income pledge as older people can.
I always wondered where they would land if they made it so people are "worthy" for paying what they can. Right now, if you can't pay 10%, why pay anything? At least that was always my attitude and I know I'm not alone in that. But if I'd been made to feel like I was a good person for at least trying to give to God's church, I would probably have tried to at least give 2% or whatever. They could try to guilt richer people into pledging more than 10%. They might be surprised at what they actually bring in.