Posted by:
Henry Bemis
(
)
Date: August 19, 2016 03:47PM
I can appreciate all of the responses above that noted an ecological perspective on hunting, and/or, of course, hunting as a food source.
But my problem with it is a deeper, human objection:
Why is it that human beings get some rush from hunting down and killing a living thing, exotic or not?
How is this "feat" an accomplishment, or something to be proud of and to display on your wall? So, you shot and killed a defenseless animal, good for you.
Why is the human instinct to kill more important than the intellectual understanding that animals are conscious beings, that have lives to enjoy, offspring, etc., such that being hunted, and shot negatively impacts the physical and mental well-being of the animal, as well as other animals that may be associated with them? Do we really have to display our superiority by killing them? Isn't it enough to just capture them, remove them from their habitat, and imprison them in zoos?
If, in fact, killing animals is a genuine response to ecological problems, can't we at least kill them humanely, and regret it, instead of using it as an opportunity for hunters to gratify their macho egos.
Oh, and here's a thought. The next time we have over-population in some region of the world, why don't we just introduce a bunch of lions into the population to bring back the ecological balance. Then, if someone posts a photo of a some poor soul being eaten, causing viral objections, we can dismiss it as an overreaction to a very real problem.