Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: Agnes Broomhead ( )
Date: March 21, 2017 09:23PM

Nothing like a Tuesday evening with something to make you smile:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpOjxE_dNKE

Or would you like to see the same thing done to a temple?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: messygoop ( )
Date: March 21, 2017 09:44PM

Couldn't the windows and other fixtures (A/C) been salvaged and donated to the needy?

It just seems like a waste to dump and bury stuff that could help people.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Kathleen ( )
Date: March 21, 2017 09:52PM

waste. waste. waste.

Looks like somebody needed a new contract.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: peculiargifts ( )
Date: March 21, 2017 11:23PM

Well, see, the thing is that it would cost extra money to take the building apart in such as way as to preserve the windows and doors and cupboards and wood and brick.

Much cheaper to trash the whole thing and bury it.

And you know how the Mormon church is --- money first and money foremost!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ificouldhietokolob ( )
Date: March 22, 2017 09:55AM

I'd be happier if they hadn't built a new one right over the old one's grave...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: ericka ( )
Date: March 22, 2017 12:57PM

Anyone here recall when members paid huge amounts into building funds? The members paid for that church. They also showed up for a lot of weekends to build it. That's how it was done back when that church was built.

All the work and money the people sacrificed for that building just got torn down. It looked like it was a perfectly good building.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: deja vue ( )
Date: March 22, 2017 02:46PM

Had they not just put in a Temple in Cedar City, the members would have been much less supportive on demolishing the old structure. Mormonism has always been more about destroying lives and seeing how much people will endure than using caring common sense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Amyjo ( )
Date: March 22, 2017 05:21PM

What a shame. It could have easily been renovated to modernize it, and retain the historical marker that it became.

In my community rather than tearing down a church house when its value as a church is no longer viable; they are restored and renovated into condos or apartments. The aesthetics are preserved.

Not that this 1927 church bldg looks all that aesthetic. But it was a waste of money to tear it down and rebuild on the same lot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **  ********   **    **   *******  
 **     **  **     **  **     **   **  **   **     ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **    ****           ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **     **      *******  
  **   **    **   **   **     **     **            ** 
   ** **      ** **    **     **     **     **     ** 
    ***        ***     ********      **      *******