Posted by:
Amyjo
(
)
Date: March 31, 2017 07:56AM
This is now the world we inhabit: (I can't help but think who would want to burden their child with either name?)
"A mom and dad in Georgia are suing the Georgia Department of Health because they refused to let the couple give their daughter the surname "Allah."
Elizabeth Handy and Bilal Walk's baby girl is now almost two years old, and she still doesn't have a last name or a birth certificate. Their chosen name, ZalyKha Graceful Lorraina Allah, was rejected by the health department. It said the law requires parents to choose the mother's last name, the father's last name or a combination of both.
Here's the catch: Handy and Walk's 3-year-old son was granted the last name with no problem. So was Walk's 16-year-old son from a previous marriage.
The ACLU of Georgia has filed a lawsuit against the Department, saying the decision is a "government overreach."...
In 2013, a Tennessee judge ordered a couple to change the name of their son, Messiah, because she stated the title had only been earned by Jesus Christ. The decision was overturned a month later and the judge was eventually fired after complaints her initial ruling was a judicial overreach.
Depending on where you live, your naming rights may be limited, but it is usually more about style and clarity than content, regulating things like numbers, pictograms, obscenities and diacriticial marks. In California, for instance, names cannot contain numbers or umlauts.
In other countries, however, naming laws can be a bit stricter. In Sweden, names cannot cause discomfort or be "unsuitable" like, say, Metallica or Superman. In Germany, names have to clearly indicate gender, and cannot represent an object or brand.
But in a country that values individual freedom as much as the US does, Young says naming laws should always lean towards parental agency."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/30/health/allah-name-rights-daughter-trnd/index.htmlEdited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/31/2017 07:58AM by Amyjo.