. .. So the Gullible Will Believe Us
From a pull-no-punches website challenging the "historical" claims for the existence of Jesus:
"Josephus (c37-100 AD)
"Flavius Josephus is a highly respected and much-quoted Romano-Jewish historian. The early Christians were zealous readers of his work.
"A native of Judea, living in the 1st century AD, Josephus was actually governor of Galilee for a time (prior to the war of 70 AD) – the very province in which Jesus allegedly did his wonders. Though not born until 37 AD and therefore not a contemporary witness to any Jesus-character, Josephus at one point even lived in Cana, the very city in which Christ is said to have wrought his first miracle.
"Josephus's two major tomes are 'History of The Jewish War' and 'The Antiquities of the Jews.' In these complementary works, the former written in the 70s, the latter in the 90s AD, Josephus mentions every noted personage of Palestine and describes every important event which occurred there during the first seventy years of the Christian era.
"At face value, Josephus appears to be the answer to the Christian apologist's dreams.
"In a single paragraph (the so-called Testimonium Flavianum) Josephus confirms every salient aspect of the Christ-myth:
"1. Jesus's existence
"2. his 'more than human' status
"3. his miracle working
"4. his teaching
"5. his ministry among the Jews and the Gentiles
"6. his Messiahship
"7. his condemnation by the Jewish priests
"8. his sentence by Pilate
"9. his death on the cross
"10. the devotion of his followers
"11. his resurrection on the 3rd day
"12. his post-death appearance
"13. his fulfillment of divine prophecy
"14. the successful continuance of the Christians.
"In just 127 words Josephus confirms everything – now that is a miracle!
_____
"BUT WAIT A MINUTE ...
"Not a single writer before the 4th century – not Justin, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Cyprian, Arnobius, etc. – in all their defences against pagan hostility, makes a single reference to Josephus’ wondrous words.
"The third century Church 'Father' Origen, for example, spent half his life and a quarter of a million words contending against the pagan writer Celsus. Origen drew on all sorts of proofs and witnesses to his arguments in his fierce defence of Christianity. He quotes from Josephus extensively. Yet even he makes no reference to this 'golden paragraph' from Josephus, which would have been the ultimate rebuttal. In fact, Origen actually said that Josephus was 'not believing in Jesus as the Christ.'
"Origen did not quote the 'golden paragraph' because this paragraph had not yet been written.
"It was absent from early copies of the works of Josephus and did not appear in Origen's third century version of Josephus, referenced in his Contra Celsum.
"Josephus knows nothing of Christians
"It was the around the year 53 AD that Josephus decided to investigate the sects among the Jews. According to the gospel fable this was the period of explosive growth for the Christian faith: 'the churches ... throughout all Judaea and Galilee and Samaria ... were edified... and ... were multiplied.' – Acts 9:31.
"This is also the time of the so-called 'Council of Jerusalem' when supposedly Paul regaled the brothers with tales of 'miracles and wonders' among the gentiles (Acts 15.12).
"And yet Josephus knows nothing of all this:
"'When I was sixteen years old, I decided to get experience with the various sects that are among us. These are three: as we have said many times, the first, that of the Pharisees, the second that of the Saduccees, the third, that of the Essenes. For I thought that in this way I would choose best, if I carefully examined them all. Therefore, submitting myself to strict training, I passed through the three groups.' – 'Life,' 2.
"Josephus elsewhere does record a 'fourth sect of Jewish philosophy' and reports that it was a 'mad distemper' agitating the entire country. But it has nothing to do with Christianity and its superstar:
"'But of the fourth sect of Jewish philosophy, Judas the Galilean was the author. These men agree in all other things with the Pharisaic notions; but they have an inviolable attachment to liberty, and say that God is to be their only Ruler and Lord.
"'They also do not value dying any kinds of death, nor indeed do they heed the deaths of their relations and friends, nor can any such fear make them call any man Lord . . .
"'And it was in Gessius Florus's time that the nation began to grow mad with this distemper, who was our procurator, and who occasioned the Jews to go wild with it by the abuse of his authority, and to make them revolt from the Romans. And these are the sects of Jewish philosophy.' – 'Antiquities' 18.23.
"Nothing could better illustrate the bogus nature of the Testimonium than the remaining corpus of Josephus's work.
"Consider, also, the anomalies:
"1. How could Josephus claim that Jesus had been the answer to his messianic hopes yet remain an orthodox Jew?
"The absurdity forces some apologists to make the ridiculous claim that Josephus was a closet Christian!
"2. If Josephus really thought Jesus had been 'the Christ' surely he would have added more about him than one paragraph, a casual aside in someone else's (Pilate's) story?
"In fact, Josephus relates much more about John the Baptist than about Jesus! He also reports in great detail the antics of other self-proclaimed messiahs, including Judas of Galilee, Theudas the Magician, and the unnamed 'Egyptian Jew' messiah.
"It is striking that though Josephus confirms everything the Christians could wish for, he adds nothing that is not in the gospel narratives, nothing that would have been unknown by Christians already.
"3. The question of context.
"'Antiquities' 18 is primarily concerned with 'all sorts of misfortunes' which befell the Jews during a period of thirty-two years (4-36 AD).
"Josephus begins with the unpopular taxation introduced by the Roman Governor Cyrenius in 6 AD. He presents a synopsis of the three established Jewish parties (Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes), but his real quarry is the 'fourth sect of philosophy . . . which laid the foundation of our future miseries." That was the sect of Judas the Galilean, "which before we were unacquainted withal.'
"At the very point we might expect a mention of 'Christians' (if any such sect existed) we have instead castigation of tax rebels!
"'It was in Gessius Florus's time [64-66] that the nation began to grow mad with this distemper, who was our procurator, and who occasioned the Jews to go wild with it by the abuse of his authority, and made them revolt from the Romans; and these are the sects of Jewish philosophy.'
"'Nor can fear of death make them call any man Lord.' Sound a tad familiar?
"Chapter 2 notes the cities built to honour the Romans; the frequent changes in high priest (up to Caiaphas) and Roman procurators (up to Pontius Pilate); and also the turmoil in Parthia.
"Chapter 3, containing the Testimonium as paragraph three, is essentially about Pilate's attempts to bring Jerusalem into the Roman system. With his first policy – placing Caesar's ensigns in Jerusalem – Pilate was forced to back down by unexpected Jewish protests in Caesarea. With his second policy – providing Jerusalem with a new aqueduct built with funds sequestered from the Temple, Pilate made ready for Jewish protests. Concealed weapons on his soldiers caused much bloodshed.
"At this point the paragraph about Jesus is introduced!
"Immediately after, Josephus continues:
"'And about the same time another terrible misfortune confounded the Jews . . .'
"There is no way that Josephus, who remained an orthodox Jew all his life and defended Judaism vociferously against Greek critics, would have thought that the execution of a messianic claimant was "another terrible misfortune" for the Jews. This is the hand of a Christian writer who himself considered the death of Jesus to be a Jewish tragedy (fitting in with his own notions of a stiff-necked race, rejected by God because they themselves had rejected the Son of God).
"With paragraph 3 removed from the text the chapter, in fact, reads better. The 'aqueduct massacre' now justifies 'another terrible misfortune.'
"4. The final assertion, that the Christians were 'not extinct at this day,' confirms that the so-called Testimonium is a later interpolation. How much later we cannot say but there was no "tribe of Christians" during Josephus' lifetime. Christianity under that moniker did not establish itself until the 2nd century. Outside of this single bogus paragraph, in all the extensive histories of Josephus there is not a single reference to Christianity anywhere.
"5. The hyperbolic language is uncharacteristic of the historian:
"' . . . as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him.'
"This is the stuff of Christian propaganda.
_____
"REALITY CHECK
"In fact, the Josephus paragraph about Jesus does not appear until the beginning of the fourth century, at the time of Constantine.
"Bishop Eusebius, that great Church propagandist and self-confessed liar-for-god, was the first person known to have quoted this paragraph of Josephus, about the year 340 AD. This was after the Christians had become the custodians of religious correctness.
"Whole libraries of antiquity were torched by the Christians. Yet unlike the works of his Jewish contemporaries, the histories of Josephus survived. They survived because the Christian censors had a use for them. They planted evidence on Josephus, turning the leading Jewish historian of his day into a witness for Jesus Christ ! Finding no references to Jesus anywhere in Josephus's genuine work, they interpolated a brief but all-embracing reference based purely on Christian belief.
"Do we need to look any further to identify Eusebius himself as the forger?
"Sanctioned by the imperial propagandist every Christian commentator for the next thirteen centuries accepted unquestioningly the entire Testimonium Flavianum, along with its declaration that Jesus 'was the Messiah.'
"And even in the twenty first century scholars who should know better trot out a truncated version of the 'golden paragraph' in a scurrilous attempt to keep Josephus 'on message.'"
(For the entire article, see: "Non-Christian Testimony? – From the Authentic Pen of Lying Christian Scribes!!," at:
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/josephus-etal.html)