Posted by:
Elder Berry
(
)
Date: February 17, 2018 12:52PM
How many people would like their sexual inclinations open knowledge? That is the question for a human society where humans are so concerned with obfuscating their own biology that bad food habits are acceptable and bad sex habits are acceptable. The problem is that bad sex habits consist of complete sexual abstinence.
I mean really, if the bishop is beating himself once a month and having sex with his wife once a week, how scandalous is that?
In my opinion hiding our sexuality is a path of humans trying to learn how to express themselves sexually in socially acceptable ways by themselves alone and only with another sexually repressed human to help while over feeding themselves to console themselves in their "bad sex habits" when a standard of complete abstinence or complete dependence upon a spouse is required.
It creates this. Some juicy bits of proof of this including the claim that sexual content now leads to pedophilia.
Good luck Jeff Holland. You disease is built in to us. Maybe you should start preaching original sin.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-utah-the-fight-against-porn-is-increasingly-being-framed-as-a-public-health-crisis/ar-BBJfnhe“It’s not the job of the government to sit in a dark room and review porn,” said Utah Rep. Michael McKell (R-Spanish Fork),
Paula Houston, the first and only porn czar, was quickly inundated by requests to get supermarkets to stop carrying racy magazines, prevent lingerie catalogues from being delivered and remove R-rated videos from public libraries. She said she ended up spending a lot of her time “just talking to people about the First Amendment, the Constitution and their rights, and that those rights apply to everyone.”
Those themes have had a significant impact on the legislative agenda of state Sen. Todd Weiler (R-Woods Cross). While he co-sponsored the bill to erase the porn czar position, saying he was simply eliminating “a dead statue,” Weiler has sponsored at least 10 bills or resolutions related to pornography in his six years in the Utah Legislature. Some colleagues have even joked they would like to make him the state’s next porn czar.
One initiative that does seem to have taken hold, though, is Weiler’s 2016 effort to declare pornography “a public health crisis.” That nonbinding resolution, unanimously passed by both chambers of the state Legislature, warned “this biological addiction leads to increasing themes of risky sexual behaviors, extreme degradation, violence, and child sexual abuse images and child pornography.”
“That’s the real problem with the whole porn addiction model,” Ley said. “It diagnoses the symptoms and not the issue. If I walk into the doctor’s office and I’m sneezing, my doctor doesn’t say ‘you have sneezing addiction, and you need to stop sneezing.’”
Rebecca Sullivan, who lectures on feminist media and cultural studies at the University of Calgary, said she is disconcerted that Canadian lawmakers adopted a porn-is-unhealthy mantra born in a conservative U.S. state.
“This isn’t a public health issue,” she said. “Are there concerns about porn? Absolutely. But they’ve framed it as a virus. Porn is not a virus. Porn is not a condition. Porn may be a symptom of greater social concerns such as lousy sex education, lack of consent-based education and rigid gender norms.”
“We do need to see this like avian flu, or cholera, or diphtheria, or polio,” Elder Jeffrey Holland, a member of the second highest governing body in the LDS church, told Utah Coalition Against Pornography conference attendees in 2016. “It needs to be eradicated.”