Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: April 12, 2019 12:42PM
A few points of order. Just because I was a JW, as I've said, so have a different perspective.
1. The name is "Jehovah's Witnesses": Witnesses of Jehovah (God) - therefore plural (not "Jehovah Witnesses"). They are literally "witnessing" for Jehovah, in their parlance.
2. Every JW is not a missionary. The regular congregants (who are all encouraged/expected to go door to door) are called "publishers" ("publishing" the Good News - their message - by going door to door with the message). There are some JW missionaries but that is over and above the regular publisher efforts. As I've said here before, I went to Quebec to be a JW missionary (preaching to the French-speaking population who were largely Catholic by definition - so yeah - good luck with that - number of converts due to my efforts = 0). When I lived in BC, I was a publisher or member not a missionary.
The quota of time spent preaching the word then was 1-2 hrs/wk from what I remember in order to be considered active (so you'd go out door to door on a Saturday morning, for instance). Not participating as a public preacher was grounds to consider someone not active - I forget the exact term they use/d to denote that you weren't participating in the preaching. Not a good place to be. In but not in. A cause for great unhappiness to be sure. Some people just don't want to do it but with JWs, as with Mormons, there are expectations laid down from top leaders. If you adhere to them you are in good standing, if not you are relegated to the back benches, or worse. It's hard on members when one standard is forced on everyone despite differing abilities and interests.
At some point the focus switched from preaching to anyone you encountered to "finding the lost sheep". They interpreted that to mean not persisting in trying to persuade those who are not interested. Their new approach was that only the lost sheep, those meant to be JWs, would be interested. They've morphed even further lately with the relatively new method of silent preaching - setting up those kiosks in public places we've spoken of recently and not directly approaching anyone but just displaying their literature.
3. We've discussed recently, Amyjo, that they are specifically taught that they are *not* solicitors; therefore, a sign saying "No Soliciting" goes over their heads. They do not consider that it applies to them. They are specifically told by leaders that it does not. I think you'll have to get your more specific sign replaced ("No Religious Calls" or whatever it said). I know it's a hassle, and an expense, but it seemed to work, no? I'm just mentioning it as I know the situation irks you but there is a solution albeit one causing you some expense and effort. If they ignore *that* sign, then that would be another story and I believe you could take further steps. Or you could just ignore them. (Do they call that often? If not, maybe you could do your BP a favour and just let it wash over you). I'm not saying it's not annoying. I felt annoying when I was forcing myself to do it as it was a requirement to be in good standing. I would say that most JWs would rather *not* engage in the formal preaching part of their religion.
I know their activities bother many people, especially those with no use for religion at all. I'm not going to justify what they do. They annoy *me* when I have to see their kiosks in not one, not two, but three of my favourite shopping and recreational areas. Annoying because it's a big reason that my time as a JW has come flooding back lately and raked up all the memories and feelings I didn't even realize were still niggly. Undoubtedly, I'd feel differently if I hadn't had the personal involvement.
And yeah, even though most don't like JWs in their face, they are not zombies or parasites or criminals, just people who are following the precepts of their faith, like Mormons, in order to fit in, follow along, fulfill the expectations of the leaders.
I'm not saying how you should feel about their unwanted intrusions but just that maybe some insight into it would tone down the annoyance level to a lower level. No point in spending a lot of energy getting too worked up about it. Isn't life challenging enough with everything else that goes on?
I know I have a soft spot for the rank and file that most non-JWs will not feel or care about. I'm not saying you have to like them or what they do or that it isn't irritating. But they're not generally known to be criminal masterminds or rapists looking for easy opportunity.
However, as Cheryl says, it is wise to exercise caution whenever opening one's door to anyone. There are a lot of door to door salespeople and others and undoubtedly some have nefarious motives. One time I had a guy knocking, saying he was a neighbour and his wife needed urgent medication they didn't have money for due to some glitch with their insurance. He blurted out a sob story that didn't hold water for me. If the situation was as dire as he made out there were remedies for them other than begging for money from neighbours. I started querying him and saying the system doesn't work that way (we have "socialized medicine" here but even if not there are usually solutions to be found with MDs and pharmacies, cutting out any need for drastic means such as begging door to door). He departed abruptly. Even so, it took me a while to realize it was a scam. I'd never seen him around either which if he was a neighbour would have been strange. It can be hard to think when a stranger shows up at the door wanting something from you. We get a ton of guys calling who want to fertilize the lawn or fix the roof or repave the driveway. Annoying, yes. Luckily, I'm in a very safe area (to date) and it's a nuisance (as they often call at dinner time) but not a danger. However, always good to keep in mind that situations arise unexpectedly and safety should be our top priority. I often choose to just not answer. Including when JWs or Mormons call. I note that lately JWs just put their leaflets through the letterbox rather than knocking and trying to start a conversation. That's fine. I can live with that.