Not a bad bet given the silliness that occurred with LogicalCanuckExmo, who appeared and served only to applaud Jordan's posts and was then promptly expunged as a sock puppet.
Is it coincidence that LogicalCanuckExmo echoes an earlier CanuckExMo who decried Ontario's culture of "entitlements" and "environmentalism" as well as the "gullibility" of Americans and liberalism in general? I think not.
Then there is the fact that whereas now Jordan claims he's never lived in Calgary--indeed that he's not even Canadian--eight years ago he wrote: "I think it would be harder to escape the Mormons than here in Calgary." Which Jordan are we to believe? The earlier one or the current one?
And now we are told that HWint--who showed up 24 days ago, uses right-wing jargon like Jordan, has the same syntax and punctuation (except when someone accuses them of being the same person, at which point the punctuation temporarily changes), and often engages with Jordan in mutual back-slapping--is actually a different person?
I think not. I believe we are dealing with a serial sock-puppeteer who feels compelled to provide his own adoring audience. And I think it moronic that Jordan would reckon no one would notice the ideological and syntactical similarities that characterize all of his false personae.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/30/2019 01:18AM by Lot's Wife.
He also used the term "straight away" [sic] a few days ago. I've never heard an American use that in normal conversation. It's very common in the U.K., somewhat common in Canada.
Brother Of Jerry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > He also used the term "straight away" a few days > ago. I've never heard an American use that in > normal conversation. It's very common in the U.K., > somewhat common in Canada. > > Straightaway - without hesitation or delay
Shocking!
I've also used the phrases lekker braai, och aye, kia ora, bonzer mare and da Jah recently. Blimey mavourneen!
Elyse Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > How can it be porn's fault when she was a sugar > baby looking for sugar daddies. > > It seems she enjoyed a dangerous life style.
He is just another idiot who has not been screened properly. He should be jailed and then stripped of US citizenship and deported... Ugly ugly...
The prospect of sex with attractive and nubile young females might be appealing to older men, but that seems to be all the Daddy might get. No real affection, or long lasting relationship. I doubt many end up happily married. And it is dangerous for both parties.
It's easy to say that she lived a dangerous lifestyle because she has been murdered. But it seems to me that that is more a judgement on her than a quantified statement. If there are some statistics that you can lead me to that proves that she was living a dangerous lifestyle that would help me.
Most "Sugar Daddies are married men, with enough expendable income to keep a young woman on the side. Messing with married people, whether a wife or husband, is not recommended. Google spousal/adultery murder. People that cheat sometimes get killed. Sometimes the person cheating with someone's spouse get murdered. A young women messing with a married woman's spouse, and by de facto, her family, often ends poorly, for all involved. Pissing off the wrong people with close emotional ties is just plain stupid and is very risky. The newspapers are filled, everyday, with people killing cheating people. Prostitution is a risky profession. "Sugar babies" are just another form of prostitution. Where I grew up, in Texas, until sometimes in the mid 70's, it was legal for a husband to kill his wife and lover if he caught them in bed-no questions asked. Now, it might not be legal, but it happens daily.
Having grown up in Texas I'm also familiar with the legal precedent of Justifiable Homicide. This is relevant how?
Happens daily?
Your whole post pisses me off more than the one I responded to.
It's obvious that you disprove of this girl who got murdered and I wonder if you might approve of murder given your strange allusion to justifiable homicide. However I haven't seen one shred of data that leads me to believe that dating older or married people is inherently dangerous. Just a few people who prefer to victim blame.
there is no reason for her to have been murdered. We can live "safe" lifestyles--whatever that might be--and still be a victim. It happens all the time.
She is a victim of a psychopath. The other recent death of a U of U student was because of a psychopath. She did everything right to become safe from this man and she still was killed.