The religious art is creepy. I see that the bishop/SP is all ready for his interviews with the office right off the main hallway, and the requisite Jesus art up on the wall.
Apart from that, it's not how I would have used that amount of space. I dislike big houses that are right on top of each other. And the home theater is a joke. But someone with a big family will love it.
Looks like a McTemple - what is with the Stake Pres office? ;-) Does one have to hold a recommend to live there? Some of the furniture and lighting looks like it could be the 'celestial room'.
The drinking fountain, screening room for the temple movie, baptismal font (pool) and the painted mural! This place had to be built by ChurchCo.
Back yard is nice but the front of the house and interior are just creepy.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/14/2020 07:56PM by holycarp.
Didn’t the Osmonds build their houses there and all lived as one happy family until they decided it was a bad idea to live under your siblings and left? I was told they lived on Osmond Lane.
kathleen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I would opt for a lesser house on a larger (not > pie-shaped) parcel.
That's a lot of house for a very small plot. No room for kids to run around and play. > > Indoor swimming pool is nice.
I'd sound proof it and make it double as a pistol range.
That SubZero freezer would be perfect to stockpile my Jeni ice cream when I hunker down to weather out the next virus crisis. The master bedroom is larger than my living room! (Can we say "master" bedroom anymore?)
I wouldn't want to live there. But I wouldn't mind the income that could afford it!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/15/2020 09:33PM by caffiend.
notmonotloggein Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...such a seemingly lavish house and still have it look so > tacky inside?
The exterior is tacky also. Those fat, fluted ionic columns? Gross!
I took a gander at what houses larger than 7500 sq ft that are on the market in my area have for lot sizes. There's a lot of variation, but generally, it's about 1/3 of an acre for every additional 1000 sq ft of house. 9000 sq ft averages about 3 acres of land.
The smallest acreage for any of the houses I looked at was .75 acres for a house in the 8000-9000 sq ft range.
Nothing was as small as a half-acre for houses this size. The Utah houses are too close together.
I used to live on Windsor Dr,, right up the street, same ward as the Osmonds. If i remember right that used to be Merrill's house about 1985, he sold it to a Dr moody for around $275,000. At he time I lived there, Alan and Wayne lived next door to each other at the end of the cul de sac. Donny had moved to another street not far down the road, and Robert Redford lived right by there on Redford Drive . Also up the street on my road was the guy who played "Grizzly Adams" can't remember his name, he was one of a few non members in the neighborhood. Also on my street 3 doors down Jimmy used to live. And 5 days down lived some guy who i don't remember his name but Brian Blossil lived there too for a while , Maries ex husband. Houses in that neighborhood sold for around average then in the mid 80's for $250,000.
Chicken N. Backpacks Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ostentatious, yes. And I don't see a good room > for a model railroad.
You just saved DavetheAtheist some time and bother.