Posted by:
SL Cabbie
(
)
Date: July 20, 2020 11:20AM
I'm leery of jumping into these arguments; from a "pure scientist" standpoint, your statement is correct, but the linguistic lines get blurred, and the nutritionist crowd (which has never impressed me; they definitely put the "con" in consensus) insists on applying their own "rules" while the culinary sorts (that's far more an art than a science) want to impose their views in a similarly arbitrary fashion.
This one is trying to sit on the fence:
https://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-why-a-tomato-is-actually-both-a-fruit-and-vegetable>>The explanation lies in the two different ways that "fruit" is defined. First, it is true that scientifically speaking, tomatoes are fruits.
>>According to Merriam-Webster, a fruit is "the usually edible reproductive body of a seed plant."
>>In a blog post, the dictionary explained it in simpler terms: "Any thing that grows on a plant and is the means by which that plant gets its seeds out into the world is a fruit."
>>That definition includes apples, tomatoes, and anything else that grows from a plant and contains seeds. (Cucumbers, peppers, pumpkins, and avocados are all fruits too, according to science.)
The one-liner I liked was "never try to put tomatoes in a fruit salad...
I propose we squash this debate.