Lot's Wife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> schrodingerscat Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > But sometimes the ‘Scientific Consensus’
> lags
> > behind individual mathematical formulas. Take
> for
> > instance, Einstein’s Cosmological Constant,
> > Lambda, which he included originally to balance
> > the static universe.
>
> Lambda was not "math." It was the absence of
> math, the failure of math. By his own account,
> Einstein created a "fudge factor" because he
> couldn't get the math to conform to known physics.
> In fact, Lambda was an early attempt to bring
> the math up to speed with the science.
Which is why NASA uses the Lambda CDM model as their standard model of the Cosmos.
https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/education/graphic_history/univ_evol.cfmhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model> ---------------
> > Had they looked South instead of North they
> might
> > have noticed the Universe. Laniakea, all 100k
> > galaxies, were all converging on the same exact
> > point in space. The Great Attractor.
> > And Einstein’s Lambda would have become the
> > basis of our best model of the Cosmos, 100yrs
> ago.
>
> Not all galaxies are converging on the Great
> Attractor. That is a local phenomenon with local
> effects. Moreover, even the local universe is not
> going to converge at that point. According to
> your own source,"is the Great Attractor a threat
> to us?
All 100,000 galaxies in our neighborhood, Laniakea, are converging on the great attaractor at 1.4 Million mph, which is what accounts for the galaxy spinning at over half a million mph, which accounts for everything that follows, the suns, planets, moons, heliosphere, magnetosphere, all follow from that scientific truth.
> "No, not really. Expansion will in this case win
> against condensing worlds.
Nobody knows if that is the case or not.
All we know is that we are balanced between dark matter (gravity) and dark energy (expansion, radiation) which equals Lambda, the cosmological constant, the speed and spin at which e=mc^2
Where energy slows down long enough to matter.
The god particle (Higgs Boson) is at work slowing down energy light, to create all the subatomic particle zoo.
Those particles slow down long enough to stick together and form atoms. Atoms stick together to form molecules.
Molecules form into plasma, electrified ionized gas,
Like Northern Lights, projected from both poles of every galaxy, negative and positive come together, condenses into matter, along the accretion disk of every galaxy, forming beautiful spiral galaxies around each black hole.
The peculiar velocity
> is only at 20% of what it should be to seal our
> fate with the Great Attractor. Everything that is
> not small clusters tends to fall apart, even the
> huge Laniakea which will one day dilute and fail
> as a supercluster. At the rate that we’re
> expanding, we will never actually come into
> contact with the mysterious Great Attractor,
> though we continue to study it."
>
>
> ----------------
> That's your own source.
I know. It’s great to speculate about it because it’s all speculation. If we could see where we think the great attractor is, 250 million light years away(which we can’t) what we’d see would be what was 250million light years away, 250 million years ago. And IT is likely moving, really fast. Why?
Where? How TF? We don’t know.
All we know is that it takes 250 million years for the Milky Way to make one full rotation, where we are located, surfing a wave, at over half a million mph, following our sun’s wake of stardust, slowing down inside our magnetosphere, long enough to matter, not only matter, but ignite the Borealis on both pole, simultaneously.
So all we can do is speculate, WTF exactly is pulling all 100k black holes and galaxies in Laniakea together, toward the same spot on space, at over a million mph?
Answer that and prepare to accept your Nobel Prize!
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 05/25/2021 09:41PM by schrodingerscat.