Your post seems to need a lot of clarification to back up your statements. For example:
gentlestrength Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/sohra> b-lutchmedial-cardiac-surgeon-obituary-1.6242359
>
> Canadian
> Scientist
> Cardiovascular Surgeon
> Double-Vaxxed with Booster
> Aggressively mocked others on social media with
> differences
> POC
This article did not mention a cause of death. I couldn't find one mentioned in numerous articles I looked up about his untimely death.
Therefore, I'm not understanding your point in posting it. From your comments, I assumed at first that you were using the doctor's death to "prove" that COVID vaccines don't protect you from death. If the doctor's death was due to non-COVID causes, his demise surely has no place in a discussion pro- or anti- the vaccines for COVID.
OTOH, even if he did die of COVID although fully vaxxed, there will be a medical reason, based on science, for why that occurred.
Without a lot of details and not being a medical expert, I am guessing that he did NOT die of COVID because the articles do not report that he was ill before his death. That is partly why his passing is so shocking to those who loved, lived and worked with him. He was asleep, with no prior reported illness, it seems, and he just peacefully passed away. The sad irony would be if it was a heart event as he was a renowned cardiac specialist.
> Great or not so great story about people that
> behave a lot like the posters in this topic.
I don't understand why you would call this a "great" story when an apparently healthy physician who was doing so much good in the world died suddenly in the midst of his bright career, leaving behind a grieving wife and children as well as many in the community where he worked for the benefit of strangers and was well known and loved. Nothing "great" about his loss of his life and the tremendous loss for those left behind.
On this thread I don't see any posters behaving badly, as you intimate by this remark. If you mean in general, yes, there is a strong pro-science presence on the board. That could well bother those who put their faith elsewhere, which I believe in this instance is a gigantic risk to their own health and that of others in their sphere.
> Considering the confirmed editorial bias I have
> not included his social media tweets, but he sound
> like the posters above. This is the just the
> facts CBC article but he should be Googled by
> those who enjoy mocking others that have come to
> different health care choices. He has been a
> leader and influencer in your movement. Seems
> like people really like him.
You mention the posters above. I repeat my statement above - what do they "sound like" that he also "sounds like"? I don't see any "mocking" in this thread. Well, unless you're objecting to the mention of microchips etc. I can see that may bug someone who is anti-vax but it's not hardcore mocking, at least in this thread, as you claim that it is.
I don't know anything about this doctor's social media tweets. I would be very surprised to see him "mocking" or otherwise negatively addressing people in general. That doesn't seem to go with the descriptions of his education, career, activities and the general way he lived his life, respecting, caring for and helping others and nurturing his family.
As for him being a leader in "your movement" - what movement? I see a whole bunch of disparate individuals all over the world who don't know each other, don't co-mingle, don't travel, don't hold meetings to gather together to strongarm people into places they don't want to go. In that regard, I *do* see anti-vax advocates attempting to force their opinions on others, going so far as to disrupt Remembrance Day ceremonies (that countless others see as sacred), to mob health care workers at hospital steps, to block traffic and generally engaging in intrusive and unsafe actions in public spaces, putting people at risk and causing fear and disruption, all to ram home their disregard for public health mandates and inexpert opinions about science and medical matters, in the midst of a pandemic that has claimed all too many lives already.
I don't see any posters here remotely behaving in this way in support of their "movement", as you seem to claim.
> I have read the labeling, no Black Box Warning, no
> serious complications or side effects—health
> care providers are legally required to report
> incidents occurring while under treatment to the
> FDA. Why are they not following this law, but
> following bureaucratic mandates instead? Do
> bureaucrats override laws in this New World.
I don't easily grasp this point you're trying to make. Are you meaning to say that the vaccines are administered without "warning" recipients about potential side effects? If so, this is incorrect, as far as I am aware and in my own experience. There is widespread information about the nature and anticipated goals for the vaccines as well as the potential for certain side effects.
What "bureaucratic mandates" are you referring to?
What "laws" are being "overridden"? As far as I know, side effects *are* reported. I have even been given a series of surveys through Public Health here in B.C. to keep track of reactions to the vaccinations as well as extent of public knowledge and understanding about them.
I am really interested in answers to these questions.
> Remember Science is never to be challenged.
On the contrary, scientists themselves challenge science. They are constantly researching, experimenting, gathering feedback and otherwise tracking and recording their results, findings and conclusions.
If this is not so, if science were standing still, we would still be experiencing polio, measles and smallpox outbreaks, there may be no vaccinations at all, people with mental illness may still be receiving electric shock treatments, AIDS would still be a death sentence, on doctors' orders women would still be using thalidomide for morning sickness, thereby inadvertently killing or damaging their unborn baby, surgery would be a literally torturous procedure, countless patients would be dying of preventable infection, and so on and so on and so on.
Science is definitely NOT standing still.
My bottom line is that I don't have any idea why you are using this doctor's sad, untimely, much-mourned death to somehow prove, it seems, that people shouldn't be getting vaccinated against COVID. What is the connection? How does his death prove anything?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/13/2021 01:19PM by Nightingale.