Posted by:
s richard bellrock
(
)
Date: January 03, 2022 03:44PM
A revelation received in 1843 (D&C 130 7-9) implies that McConkie is mistaken in his assertion that the LDS God has nothing left to learn. “The place where God resides is a great Urim and Thummim…a globe like a sea of glass and fire…” And one benefit of living on a planet size Urim and Thummim is that it acts as a source of information: “…all things pertaining to an inferior kingdom, or all kingdoms of a lower order, will be manifest to those who dwell on it…” If God has a source of information, at least some of His knowledge is contingent upon that source, and consequently, His knowledge is not infinite.
Further to the place where God resides, LDS scripture actually names the location. Defenders of the faith will try to object that “Mormons do not believe that God lives on Kolob”[xxxiii] but I do not share their confidence in such an off handed dismissal for two reasons.
First, the apologetic response is due to the fact that Abraham 3: 2-3, 16, and Facsimile 2 describes Kolob as the star nearest the throne of God, not the planet. But to be frank, the perceived quirkiness of the “God lives on Kolob” issue is not due to whether Kolob is the name of the planet as opposed to the star, but due to the fact that God lives at a specific, named, location in time and space.
Additionally, I think that the apologist hand waving is too quick to dismiss the idea that Kolob is the name of God’s planet. The above mentioned Abraham 3: 2-3 which calls Kolob a star, also describes “that upon which thou standest” (i.e. the Earth) as being in the same category of things as Kolob. Facsimile 2: 1 indicates that “[o]ne day in Kolob is equal to a thousand years according to the measurement of this earth…” because (Abraham 3: 4) Kolob was after the manner of the Lord, according to its times and seasons in the revolutions thereof; that one revolution was a day unto the Lord, after his manner of reckoning, it being one thousand years according to the time appointed unto that whereon thou standest.” This is read by LDS Living (I know, I know. Not an official source of doctrine) as meaning that “Kolob rotates more slowly on its axis.” Defining seasons and days in terms of revolutions/axis rotation is a description of planets, not stars. In order for there to be “days” on Kolob, Kolob would be rotating relative to a light source (its star). Facsimile 2: 2 describes a figure standing next to Kolob, and “holding the key of power also, pertaining to other planets…” (italics added).
It is only peripheral to the central point of this essay, but my reading of Abraham is that it does not distinguish between stars and planets, and uses the terms interchangeably. LDS friendly authors have come to similar conclusions,[xxxiv][xxxv] thereby leaving enough wiggle room to make it difficult to conclude with any measure of confidence that Kolob is not the name of God’s planet.
Taken from
https://unexaminedfaith.blogspot.com/2019/08/on-non-infinity-of-lds-conception-of-god.html?m=1