...over heavy rain damage.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kentucky-noahs-ark-encounter-sues-insurance-company-over-heavy-rain-damage/

There is a certain irony in that (although the damage was to the access road, and not the ark itself.)

I can't believe that the attraction is "popular." I read a description early on, and it sounded mediocre in the extreme.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/02/2022 07:35AM by summer.

Hmm... I sense a pattern here:

"In May 2019, Ark Encounter filed a federal lawsuit against its five insurance carriers for not covering nearly $1 million in damages from roadway failure subsequent to rain.[79] According to the lawsuit, an access road was damaged by heavy rains in 2017 and 2018, which caused a landslide. Insurance companies cited an exclusion for correcting design deficiencies or faulty workmanship. The suit asked for compensatory and punitive damages.[79][80] The ark itself was not damaged in the incident, and the attraction remained open to visitors.[80][81] The insurance company, Allied World, applied to separate the "breach-of-contract" claims from the "bad-faith claims" but the court rejected the request. The case was settled in August 2020 when lawyers for both sides requested that the case be dismissed. Settlement details were not made public.[82]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ark_Encounter

Susan I/S Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...over heavy rain damage.



Susan, that would be fitting for EB’s Paraprosdokian Contest !
:D