Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: March 14, 2024 02:36PM
bradley Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Since immaculate conception implies a lack of
> genetic diversity, wasn't Jesus kind of inbred?
Immaculate conception refers to Mary - from Britannica:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Immaculate-Conception-Roman-Catholicism"Immaculate conception, Roman Catholic dogma asserting that Mary, the mother of Jesus, was preserved free from the effects of the sin of Adam (usually referred to as “original sin”) from the first instant of her conception. Although various texts in both the Old and the New Testaments have been cited in defense of the doctrine, it seems to have arisen from a general acceptance in the early church of Mary’s holiness. Especially after Mary had been solemnly declared to be the mother of God at the Council of Ephesus in 431, most theologians doubted that one who had been so close to God could have actually experienced sinful acts (i.e. intercourse - as she wasn't married at the time of conception)."
> And if his family line continued in that way,
> wouldn't Jesus have to be transgender? A gender
> transition complete with a reproductive system
> capable of giving birth would be a medical
> miracle, but I think Jesus could pull it off. Then
> he could have his own immaculate conception just
> like mom.
>
> That would explain the trans movement. They are
> preparing us for the Second Coming.
I don't follow your commentary here.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/14/2024 02:36PM by Nightingale.