Posted by:
anagrammy
(
)
Date: October 27, 2011 05:18PM
This is an area in which I have had some success.
Some of you know I like to use pets because young children have difficulty with abstractions, but they can be taught simple logic.
This is an example of a two-part lesson teaching the difference between observation and drawing a conclusion.
PART 1
Adult: How well do you know Fido?
Child: Pretty well, very well, he's my best friend, etc.
Adult: Terrific, because I'm going to ask you some questions about him.
Child: Great- I know him best of anyone.
Adult: What does Fido do when he's hungry?
Child: Answer or I don't know.
Adult: How do you know that? Dogs can't tell you what they are thinking.
Child: I see him do it all the time and then when we feed him he stops.
Adult: You just made an observation. You observed something--that means you saw it. What do you see him doing right now?
Child: (responds)
Adult: You observed him sleeping on his chair. Do you think he's hungry?
Child: No because he would be (action) if he wanted food.
Adult: You just made a conclusion! You are so smart!
Child: I am?
Adult: Yes, indeed. You made the observation that Fido was sleeping and you drew the conclusion that he was not hungry.
Child: Yes - because he wasn't (action)
Adult: That's what scientists do. They make observations and they draw conclusions from what they see--you could be a scientist when you grow up, you know.
Child: I could?
Adult: Yes, because your conclusion was smart thinking. I'd like to hear more of your conclusions later, but right now let's go have ice cream (or swing, etc).
It's important to keep these conversations short so they child wishes you could go on some more. Their span of attention is short and this is about right for a 4-5 year old.
The next session would have the child making another observation about the dog prompted by the intro, Let's see what we know is true about Fido. Let's make some observations....Fido sometimes barks loudly all of a sudden for no reason at all-- why? Then you carry through with the child understanding that he knows someone is walking toward the house because when Fido barks, shortly thereafter, someone goes by or someone knocks. He has made a conclusion based on his observation of Fido barking many times. We introduce the idea that it is PROBABLE that there is someone coming; however, POSSIBLE that a burglar is breaking in. Is it more probable that someone is walking down the street in front of the house or more likely that a burglar is breaking in?
How do you know which answer is the truth? We can't know for sure, so we go with what's probable, so usually you would just look out the window, right?
Now the neighbor comes over while Fido is barking and says to you that you better call the police because the dog is barking and there must be a burgler. What do you say to the neighbor? (No, he barks whenever people walk by). Now he tells you that you can know what is true by listening to him. What do you say to that? (No, I can draw my own conclusions from my observations)
This is simplified, but gives you the template. To show you how well this works in making life easier for toddlers, I'll give you an example from my own life. My grandson is four. His mother lets him eat chocolate chips out of the package. I don't. Mother leaves me babysitting and the boy sees a new package of chocolate chips sitting on the table. He says to me, "My mother let's me eat these." And I respond, "Hmmm. I don't." He takes them to a hidden corner of the yard and tries to eat them without me seeing him. We have this conversation:
ME: That is not honest.
HIM: I want chocolate chips.
ME: You can't always get what you want. You know there's song about this by a rock n roll band. I begin singing, "You can't always get what you WAAAANT....but....you get what you NEEEEED."
Have you observed that grown-ups are all different? That one grownup says you can do something and the other says no?
HIM: Tilts his head. "I've noticed that."
ME: It's something every kid learns sooner or later. When Mom's here, she's in charge. When she's gone, another adult is in charge, right?
HIM: My mom and dad have different rules....(gives example)
ME: GREAT! You have made another brilliant observation...and what is your conclusion?
HIM: When YOU'RE here, I have to do what YOU say.
ME: EXACTLY! Someday you may become a brilliant scientist and study microbiology like your Daddy.
This is one way to help your little ones put on the full armor of reason and develop pride in their thinking ability as opposed to pride in their ability to mindlessly obey. When you use this method, you are vaccinating your children or grandchildren against Mormonism, Scientology, Jehovah Witnesses, MLM's, and every other type of scam that is on earth that would deprive them of their money or their freedom to live their own lives. What a gift! What a legacy! They will never forget you!
Given this background, you would just ask the five year old if you can better draw a conclusion about Fido better from what some neighbor comes over and says or based on what you yourself observed.
Anagrammy
PS. Critical thinking children and grandchildren are the most wonderful balm on the scars and regrets that Mormonism leaves us with.