Posted by:
SusieQ#1
(
)
Date: February 21, 2012 01:26PM
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,423906In response to Cheryl's last comment:]
>>>Yes, I get it about how the creep went balistic.
There's no way everyone who happens to attend that church would know about this special privilege without having it posted on the door in the form of a warning telling females they could use another restroom.
-------YES. That works very well.
One thing that does bother me is your repeated mindreading act which assumes so many posters unlike you are full of unjust anger. That assumption is unsubstantiated and distasteful. Attacking unstated motives isn't logical or fair minded.>>>
- - - - - -
One more point about the absurdity of the whole thing.
The husband ran around outside racing with his wife in a wheelchair to come back into the building into the bishops office to claim I had attacked him in the women's restroom.
How crazy is that? I mean..really? He thinks that's plausible?
And there the woman sat: frozen, totally silent, eyes blank.
And more craziness? They believed him?
Must have!
Well, apparently, at least one of the men realized how absurd his claim was and apologized to me, months later.
This is what is most disturbing: It seems to be the general accepted opinion that if a priesthood member says something it must be true, and the woman must be lying. That is what my daughter and I dealt with.
Somehow they had to change the events to make it my fault that he was watching women and children in partial dress thinking they had privacy.
When a bishop discounted me, her mother, that was the last straw for her also. She had enough of their absurdities.
There was no way she would ever go back either.'
And, yes, Cheryl, people who live in a state of anger toward a whole group of people interestingly, it appears, take the same position as the priesthood brethren. I find that rather humorous, actually! :-)