Posted by:
ThinkingOutLoud
(
)
Date: September 22, 2012 12:10PM
I can tell you one way you know it is a scam: if there really were a permanent cure for tinnitus---would it be controlled by one and only one group? Would only one group be able to say that they and only they have the answerr to one of medical science's persistent mysteries?
Even if one pharmaceutical company can lay claim to the fact that they discovered or generated a cure for one thing, or some pill which relieved a great deal of the symptoms someone suffering said disease has---just how long do you think it would take for another legit pharmaceutical firm to produce something similar, or come up with a generic that does the same thing?
They might not be able to sell it yet, due to licensing issues or patent issues with the original pill maker, but they would knwo about it, it would be appearing in legit peer-reviewed medical and science journals, it would be studied in labs and universities all over the place and whatever it was would be talked about in the NYT, your doctor would be sicussing it with you directly and telling you it would soon be on the market and available to you, etc.
It would NOT be sold out of the back pages of a magazine, only sold direct mail or door to door, or sold only online or ony through one group of salespeople via only one company.
That would be a little like claiming that the only real milk in the entire world is sold by Day's Dairy and no one else in the world has milk, despite owning tons of cows who are known to make their own milk, or knows how to identify milk, can call it milk, collect it, bottle it and sell it, or make pros off this miraculous "milk" they claim to be the one true purveyer of.
And, unless you know that people outside the manufacture, profiteering and sales of this so-called one true milk are actually using it, and getting real benefits from it--and not just claiming they are to get you to buy into the whole enterprise--then how do you know you are being told the real truth about theis "real milk" they wan you to buy from them?
You don't, which is why scientists always hide from their test subjects which ones are actually taking a drug or food, when observing them, and it is why the scientists themselves performing the tests also do not know which subjects are actually ingesting that pill or food.
People who know others benefit from saying yes, it works, especially if those people are sisters and brothers of sellers, or hope to sell and make money from theat same thing being sold, canot be relied upon to always tell the truth of their product's effectiveness. We are biased toward helping others we know and we are biased toward hiding the negatives of anything we ourselves like or use and feel very connected to.
Kinda like iPhone users ponying up for the next new iPhone, and paying more for it, because they are committed to the belief that iPhones and Apple are perfect, to the idea that something so costly and hard to get must naturally be the very best there is, and that I must believe everything else out there sucks eggs to justify and defend my own personal choice that iPhones are the only phone that matters.
In other words: where is the science, as tested and discussed ina legit, peer-reviewed journals, to show that this stuff works for the majority of the popel taking it? Was the sample of people tested on large enough to project out (extropolate) to larger groups of humans? Why is there not one person who used the product who found any fault with it, however minor, in any way?
Come on. Even people cured of cancer hate the radiation, the loss of their hair as a result, the chemo and have plenty to say about how awful that whole process is. And not one person said the product was expensive, hard to find, difficult to use, gave them one iota of difficulty or trouble? Not one?
BE SKEPTICAL UNITIL SCIENCE AND GOOD SENSE SHOW YOU TO OPERATE OTHERWISE