Well? Does it?

There has been some recent reports that it helps increase the chances that the woman will conceive because her body is less likely to reject or attack the sperm as foreign bodies like bacteria.

It used to be, but now it's something that the church has "no official stance" on I think.

Yup. They used to care, until they realized it was super creepy for a bunch of old guys to tell people how to bang their own spouses.

They claim they don't have an official stance, but that's a lie.

http://www.i4m.com/think/sexuality/mormon_oral_sex.htm

"The First Presidency has interpreted oral sex as constituting an unnatural, impure, or unholy practice. If a person is engaged in a practice which troubles him enough to ask about it, he should discontinue it."
- Official Declaration of the First Presidency of the Church, January 5th, 1982.


From the FIRST PRESIDENCY. Any official declaration signed from the 1st presidency is revelation from God.

Yup Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
If a person is engaged in a practice
which troubles him enough to ask about it, he
should discontinue it."
- Official Declaration of the First Presidency of
the Church, January 5th, 1982.

And this was my opinion about tithing, so I discontinued it...:0)

So the key is, just not to ask about it?

:P

Oh... So I guess they aren't ok with backdoor either then... Wow that all sounds pretty boring :/

The only 2 officially supported positions are:
Missionary & Returned Missionary positions.

jk

LOL!

What is a 'returned missionary' position?

How is it different from "missionary position"?

Someone please enlighten me....

I hadn't thought that far ahead when I invented it... but let's make something up here...

It's very similar to a door approach. After 2 years of practice, all they know is to knock on the door, and reach out and vigorously shake the hand of whoever answers, & only go in if they are invited.

So it's your basic knock, shake, & enter if asked.

(That was the best I could invent on the spot... feel free to change it to something better when you invent it)

I warned one of my dates about dating Mormons because if you do anything with them and they are active Mos. they will "return and report" to their Bishop about everything they did!

So I thought the returned missionary position;
maybe all words exchanged would be in a foreign accent?

Or someone turns around and presents a different side of themselves?

Or worse yet its a matter of "I will through the veil"...

Haha, I went down the path of your last suggestion for a while, but it strayed to far away from "mission" related humor, so I deleted it and started over.

All good suggestions though

Here's what I think. They want to insist on 'insert tab p into slot v' in order to keep people making lots of babies and also to try to show that hetero sex is the only natural and pure sex. If it's OK for opposite-sex couples to please each other in a variety of different ways with their various body parts, then maybe people will start to think it's OK for same-sex couples to do the same.

It would be if you were married to Packer! Ew!

You mean Pecker not Packer lol

Oh they have some nerve. Their founder had sex with 33 women some underaged and they have the nerve to say no oral sex? Some women can only orgasm with oral sex so they are ruining their sex lives

The most recent statements and training to bishops/stake presidents is to stay out of the bedroom of married couples.

However, there are the past statements - it's been 20-30 years.

Also, you can pretty much guarantee that most bishop's will give an answer like this:

If you worry enough to ask you then you shouldn't do it.

I *always* hated answers like that, because I was so super-conservative mormon, that they couldn't fathom what things worried me.

I had a church leader tell me that before I got married (He wouldn't even listen to my question, but just gave me that answer).

My question *would have been* (if he'd let me speak it out loud) "Do you have to keep the garments on during sex, and have intercourse through the fly."

But he was just so full of the spirit that he knew his one size fits all answer would be perfect for me too.

what a tool.

Luckily I talked to my already married friend and found out that it was ok to take them off (otherwise that could have led to a really crappy honeymoon).

'Tis around my house.

Boo.

Sex is a sin for MORmON couples unless they are doing it to make a new little MORmON, 3 minute mark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYsi-r1amY0

When my wife is bad I'm sure to give her a good tongue lashing.

In all seriousness though, much is made about the sexually repressed Mormon but it's almost always done so from the male perspective. This speaks to the abuse of Women within the church just as much as anything else does and it's very sad. They have to pop out multiple kids to feel even remotely worthy and many of them have to endure such sad, boring sex lives for their entire existence. We all know how much those grouchy old tbm women could use some quality foreplay and then a good stiff one.

The Bible supports the practice of oral sex

http://www.sexinchrist.com/oralsex.html

I chose to leave before I would have to deal with this issue.

To me it is absolutely absurd and I would have been out of my skull if someone tried to insert themselves into my sexuality in marriage especially without scripture, without official Mormon Doctrine, and without standing. (Maybe through an easily manipulated partner)

What would a conversation like that be? Sister so and so, do you have unnatural sex acts with your husband?

What's unnatural Bishop? Give me further light and knowledge.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2012 02:27PM by gentlestrength.

I was in a student ward at the UofU when a bishop told the entire room full of us that oral sex was a sin. This was in the early 90's.

I have been married to two uber TBM women. It became obvious that neither had any objection whatever to receiving such as that we are referring to. Both were quite opposed to providing said service to yours truly, however.

People are free to make themselves slaves to religious organizations, to freely receive tons of guilt until their little masochistic souls are dripping with it. I now refuse to do that. No one gets to tell me what to do in the bedroom or any other room for that matter. I only acknowledge authorities who have legal and lawful power to direct me. I'm a free man living in the 21st century.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/08/2012 03:40PM by rationalguy.

They once put out declaration that oral sex was wrong, and told Bishops to ask about it to married couples. Naturally, married couples told their bishops where to stick it, so the church told Bishops to stop asking.

Note that they never rescinded the declaration, nor did they repeat. This is typical for LDS theology. Now some people claim that oral sex is wrong, and others claim that they've never heard this. So, you have a bunch of people running around with conflicting notions of what is acceptable and what isn't.

Sometimes I wonder if the church prefers it this way. No one is really clear what is right or wrong on issues like caffeine, oral sex, or what to do on Sunday. The prigs claim they have a higher standars, and more normal members think there are too many rules already.