Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 05:01PM

(Prefatory note):

FAIR chair John Lynch (who was outted here on RfM where he came dressed as a wolf in sheep's clothing attempting to post disingenuously as a supposedly innocent and inquisitive soul--and who has more recently been outted on internet reader commentary sites where he's been attacking managing editor of MormonThink.com David Twede under the shady handle of "John L") now has a false claim up on FAIR's site claiming that I was supposedly in cahoots with Twede on composing Twede.s statements to the media.

John Lynch initially--and falsely--asserted (as "John L," with no acknowledgment of his attachment to the Mo-apologist outfit FAIR for which he faithfully and mindlessly labors) that I had offered to write Twede's initial press release.

That is a wholesale fabrication, on the order of the Book of Mormon "golden plates."

Twede composed his own press release and then sent it to me unsolicited, after having first contacted me on his own, where he asked if I could assist him in getting national media exposure regarding planned MormonThink.com website postings per Romney, LDS-temple God doctrine, that doctrine's potential impact on a Romney U.S. presidency and the politicking history the LDS Church. I replied that I would do what I could. Twede then sent me his personally-crafted press release on his upcoming Mormon Church "apostasy" trial, which I posted on RfM as he had originally composed and sent it to me.

The RfM posting of Twede's own press release was then seen on this site by Sue Emmett of the ExMormon Foundation, who on her own then relayed it to reporter Jamie Reno of "The Daily Beast." Reno called me, asking how to contact Twede. Reno then proceeded to interview Twede and wrote a story on Twede's threatened Mormon Church excommunication hearing, which subsequently attracted both national and international media attention.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Here is MormonThink's own account of what has happened, in the larger-picture perspective:

"FAIR helped make MT what it is today.

"MormonThink was largely obscure until FAIR came along. First they mentioned it in one of their FAIR conferences and MT hits doubled. They then made it the only website 'worthy of a FAIR review' (they did John Dehlin's also but took it off when he complained)--hits went way up after that also.

"Then they got into a war with us about the translation process and MT hits continued to go up as readers tuned in.

"Then they upped the stakes and started outing the MT contributors that they could find and reporting them to the Church. Well, hits exploded after MT hit the media. I saw it on dozens of media outlets, on ABC News, etc. Reporters wrote and called constantly. We now have a large list of media contacts ready at our disposal whenever FAIR wants to publicize MT again.

"Hits topped about 3,000,000 last month and have stayed at a consistent double what they were just two months ago--thanks to FAIR. They are pacing at a steady 70,000 hits per day now.

"We've had literally hundreds and hundreds of emails sent to us since the story prompted by Scott Gordon of FAIR hit the presses [the story of FAIR outting Twede to Mormon Church HQ in Salt Lake City, which prompted the set-up of Twede's excommunication hearing by local Mormon henchmen in Orlando, Florida, where Twede resides]. Many of those emails were from people that just found out about MormonThink for the first time after reading about all the hub-bub on the Internet. These people were not happy that the church kept so much of its disturbing history from them and they thanked us for providing all this information in one, easy-to-find place. . . .

"And all of this is due to you FAIR. Thank you so much for not ignoring us. We couldn't afford any better publicity than you give us. Please keep it up.

"Sincerely

"The MormonThink Staff"

http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,669822,669868#msg-669868


Now for some history on Mormon apologists at FAIR who are frantically attempting to rewrite history.

Lynch and Company are presently making a typical limp LDS skinback with this latest piece of FARMS-like horse pucky:

"In his effort to manipulate the media and harm the Church, David Twede and Steve Benson attempted to craft a narrative in which Twede was the bewildered victim of persecution by the Church for his anti-Romney views."

http://en.fairmormon.org/Website_reviews/MormonThink

see also, related RFM thread: http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,669822,669822#msg-669822


Ahem. Here's a press release for you, Brother Lynch:

BULLETIN: John Lynch--chairman of an obsolete Mormon apologist outfit who was booted a few years ago from the "Recovery from Mormonism" bulletin board for masquerading as someone other than himself (as he has done here, as well)--was caught on "The Daily Beast" delivering a message to David Twede under his now-familar alias, "John L."

The message Lynch was spotted smuggling to Twede read: “Twede, You should really distance yourself from Benson. He is not doing you any favors. He is like Bin Laden, happy to call you courageous as he straps a bomb to your back. He is using you for his own purpose, and does not care the impact on you. At the very least, you should think about this. John L.”

This is the same John Lynch whose propaganda arm of the Mormon Church, FAIR, relayed (for its own purposes, not caring about the impact it would have on Twede), Twede's personal identification information to the Mormon Church in Salt Lake City, which prompted excommuncation scheduling for Twede in Orlando. When intercepted, Lynch refused to confirm what is widely known outside his small circle of Mormon comrades: that he is, in fact, the chairman of FAIR.

**********


--How the Lurking Lying Lynch Learned to Lie for His Lying LDS Lord

John Lynch clearly must have learned his lying-for-the-Lord technique from that mythical character of Book of Mormon snore-lore, Nephi, who faked being somebody else in order to get at the equally mythical brass plates.

Here's how Mormon trolls justify sneaking on to the RfM board (and other sites) under false pretenses in order to do the will of their God by using their super hero action figure Nephi as their dishonest modus operandi.

It's called Troll Tactics 101:

1 Ne 4:19 "And after I [Nephi] had smitten off his [Laban's] head with his own sword, I took the garments of Laban and put them upon mine own body; yea, even every whit; and I did gird on his armor about my loins."

Mormon trolls don this fake outer costume in order to gain unsuspected entry into RfM, with the hopes of raiding the place and carrying away ex-Mormons to LDS salvation:

1 Ne 4:20 "And after I had done this, I went forth unto the treasury of Laban. And as I went forth towards the treasury of Laban, behold, I saw the servant of Laban who had the keys of the treasury. And I commanded him in the voice of Laban, that he should go with me into the treasury."
_____


Mormon trolls deliberately engage in their misrepresentations in an attempt to deceive their ex-Mormon enemies:

1 Ne 4:21 "And he supposed me to be his master, Laban, for he beheld the garments and also the sword girded about my loins."
_____


Mormon trolls, in this premeditated plan among true believers, pretend to speak the language of ex-Mormons, with the intent of tricking them into thinking that the trolls are one with the ex-Mormons:

1 Ne 4:22-24 "And he spake unto me concerning the elders of the Jews, he knowing that his master, Laban, had been out by night among them.

"And I spake unto him as if it had been Laban.

"And I also spake unto him that I should carry the engravings, which were upon the plates of brass, to my elder brethren, who were without the walls."
_____


Mormon trolls conspire in efforts to get ex-Mormons to follow them, hoping that the ex-Mormons will be persuaded to believe that the trolls are ex-Mo sympathetic--all the while, of course, continuing their deceptive and trollish ways:

1 Ne 4:25-27 "And I also bade him that he should follow me.

"And he, supposing that I spake of the brethren of the church, and that I was truly that Laban whom I had slain, wherefore he did follow me."

"And he spake unto me many times concerning the elders of the Jews, as I went forth unto my brethren, who were without the walls."
_____


Mormon trolls reassure their fellow Mormons who are observing this carefully-crafted charade that it is all an act (under God's command, of course), and not to worry about their true identity or purpose:

1 Ne 4:28-29 "And it came to pass that when Laman saw me he was exceedingly frightened, and also Lemuel and Sam. And they fled from before my presence; for they supposed it was Laban, and that he had slain me and had sought to take away their lives also.

"And it came to pass that I called after them, and they did hear me; wherefore they did cease to flee from my presence."
_____


Once ex-Mormons realize that they are in the presence of Mormon trolls who are attempting to mislead, misrepresent and lie to them through their dishonest door approaches, the desperate Mormon trolls attempt to exert control over the ex-Mormons by threatening them with God's punishment-- including death--if they do not return to the LDS fold forthwith. (Some relatively new ex-Mormons are momentarily shaken by this strong-armed, heavy-handed approach):

1 Ne 4:30-33 "And it came to pass that when the servant of Laban beheld my brethren he began to tremble, and was about to flee from before me and return to the city of Jerusalem.

"And now I, Nephi, being a man large in stature, and also having received much strength of the Lord, therefore I did seize upon the servant of Laban, and held him, that he should not flee.

"And it came to pass that I spake with him, that if he would hearken unto my words, as the Lord liveth, and as I live, even so that if he would hearken unto our words, we would spare his life.

"And I spake unto him, even with an oath, that he need not fear; that he should be a free man like unto us if he would go down in the wilderness with us.

"And I also spake unto him, saying: Surely the Lord hath commanded us to do this thing; and shall we not be diligent in keeping the commandments of the Lord? Therefore, if thou wilt go down into the wilderness to my father thou shalt have place with us."
_____


At this point, however, ex-Mormons diverge from the prepared text of the RfM-invading Mormon trolls.

They call out Nephi and his band of fellow two-faced trolling liars, kick them in their collective posteriors and head into town for drinks.

In the name of nailing Nephi and his faithful flock of little lying lambs.

Amen.

**********


P.S.: For those who may not have seen it before, here's the account of FAIR chair John Lynch being caught in red-handed troll-lying on RfM:

"Bagged, Part 2: There's a Good Chance That FAIR's Chair, John Lynch (Posing as "John L."), Is the One Joining with Other Swarmin' Mormons in Attacking "The Daily Beast"

I have been informed by a solid source that among the Mormon critics bashing reporter Jamie Reno and “The Daily Beast” for their commendable reporting on “MormonThink's” managing editor David Twede's upcoming excommunication trial (a trial connected to David's criticism of Romney and the LDS Church), is probably none other than chairman of the Mormon apologist group FAIR, John Lynch.

The solid sense is that the “John L.” buzzing around “The Daily Beast's” site like a rabidly-desperate Deseret honeybee is, in all likelihood, THAT John Lynch.

Certainly, “MormonThink” has been a big, fat burr umder FAIR's thin-skinned saddle, as is clear from FAIR's obsession with what shows up on MT's site:

(see, for instance, “Criticism of Mormonism/Websites/MormonThink/Polygamy,” on FAIR wiki, at: http://en.fairmormon.org/Criticism_of_Mormonism/Websites/MormonThink/Polygamy)


David, in his latest blog post on “Mormon.Think.com,” has called out FAIR as the Calilfornia-based apologetic club for the LDS Church that was behind the outting of David to the Mormon Church's Salt Lake City headquarters (which then notifed David's Orlando-area bishop and stake president, who then rapidly set up an excommunication hearing).

As David writes:

". . . [A]fter having some sleep, and now that the 'NY Times' article came out, I read statements by Scott Gordon, a Mormon apologist, that indicated he was behind turning me into the Church authorities. One of his statements has resolved me back to my original gut feeling--that this is probably in part about the LDS Church squelching my political speech. The reason is a little complex. Let me start with his particular quote from the NY Times:

“'It has nothing to do with Romney,' Mr. Gordon said. 'I know members very high up in the church who are voting for Obama.'

“'It’s about him posting on a blog that he was actively in there trying to subvert people’s beliefs in the L.D.S. Church,' Mr. Gordon said . . . '

"If you've read my 'The Mysteries of the Gospel' blog, you will know that the only case Gordon had against me was that I wrote about emailing with 'Pat' who I indicated was a questioning member. I wrote:

"'I decided to send Pat two links: The first link to 'Mormon Infographics' on the Book of Abraham, and a second one to FAIR’s explanation of one of the facsimiles.'

"Links included in this were:

http://www.mormoninfographics.com/search/label/Facsimile

http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Joseph_Smith_Papyri/Facsimiles/Facsimile_3


"The latter is directly from Scott Gordon's own group, FAIR. In other words, I gave someone information that FAIR wrote. I find it extremely unlikely that this is what got the LDS Salt Lake leaders' panties in a bunch. If that were true, Scott Gordon would also be called in for disciplinary court..”

(David Twede, quoted in “**MEDIA ALERT) 'War Worn': In an Open, Honest & Brave Acknowledgement, David Twede Says the Mormon Church Excommunication Court Against Him Is, In fact, Related to Mitt Romney**, by Steve Benson, “Recovery from Mormonism” board, 22 September 2012: at: http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,646928,646928#msg-646928)


David further fingers FAIR has the whistle-blowing lapdog for the Mormon Church in this post that he put up on RfM:

“I believe everyone involved from FAIR, the GAs and the stake leaders know clearly that using my Romney speech as the basis for excom would be a PR disaster. So you would never expect them to bring it up. Instead they will dance around anything they can find to halt the voices at 'MT.'

“My feeling is the timing is very suspicious.

“The interrogation mostly focused on why I hid my identity, at the 'MT.com' site where my only activity in the past week was about LDS political history. And they talked about my blog of which 3 of seven entries during that week were in fact about Romney. Specifics were not given. I asked what specifically was wrong with what I wrote, and I was told the tone and bias against the church was clear. The stake presidency never had the courage to really talk directly about specifics.

“On the other hand, Scott Gordon did attempt to side-track us by the following from the 'NYTimes' article.

"'Scott Gordon, president of the Foundation for Apologetic Information and Research, an organization in Redding, Calif., that defends Mormon theology, said that he had forwarded materials posted by Mr. Twede to Church officials in Salt Lake City.'

“That FAIR outed me by name and sent my material to SLC officials I have no doubt. In fact, there is evidence it may not have been Gordon, initially, at least that spied. At least two other members of FAIR, acting as de-facto members of the Strengthening Members Committee had a hand in the activities surrounding these events.”

(“Re: The mormonthink fiasco *is* about Romney - Dave correct me if I'm wrong,” by David Twede, “Recovery from Mormonism” bulletin board, 22 September 2012, at: http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,646557,646711#msg-646711)


FAIR (courtesy of “John L.”--aka, John Lynch, FAIR's empty chair) has its fingerprints all over “The Daily Beast” website.

If you go to “The Daily Beast” site where Reno's story about David appears, you will observe in the commentary section how a certain “John L.” has been literally swarming the place with his criticism of Reno and his article.

(“Mormons Want to Excommunicate Romney Critic,” by Jamie Reno, 21 September 2012, at:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/21/mormons-want-to-excommunicate-romney-critic.html)


By the way, at one time FAIR's Chair, John Lynch, came to RfM under false pretenses, faking as if he was simply a sincere and inquiring individual, looking for peace, understanding and love in all the right places. He was eventually outted and banned from the board.

For RfM newbies, below is an account of Lynch's attempt to come to RfM dressed as a sheep in wolves' garments:

--All's FAIR in Uncovering Lying for the Lord: Remembering When FAIR's Chair John Lynch Came to RfM, Lied and Got Lynched (*Special Edited-In Bonus: Lynch's Private E-mails to Me)...


BACKGROUND ON LYNCH'S BUNGLED ATTEMPT AT BAITING

Chairman of the A#1 Apologetics Board for the Lord, John Lynch, came on RfM a few years back (cleverly, or so he apparently thought), during the time when I posted a series of back-channel exchanges which he and I had had (a series, by the way, which Lynch initiated by contacting me at my work after initially having posed a question to me on RfM.

Going off-board, he then began poking around under the guise of innocent inquiry which really wasn't so innocent, as further reading will reveal).

During those early e-mail exchanges, Lynch attempted to cover his connection to FAIR. Ultimately, however, when pressed, he was forced to admit whose water he was actually carrying: FAIR's LDS H20.

What a drip.
_____


WHAT STARTED THE SNIFFIN': LYNCH CONTACTS ME OFF-BOARD POSING AS A SIMPLE BELIEVING LATTER-SAINT WITH QUESTIONS, WHO JUST WANTS TO LEARN

Below are my e-mails back and forth with Lynch (the ones which he initiated back in October 2005 without revealing to me his true identity).

Please note his smooth-talking, disingenuous and ingratiating style, as he sought to ply me for information while covering his own tracks back to the FAIR lair.

--Lynch to me:

"Steve,

"I posted a question to you at the exmo boards, then got chastised for being a troll. Not true, just a TBM trying to learn. Figuring you might ignore me when that happened, I thought I would try my luck through the [Arizona] Republic (I did a google on Steve Benson Cartoon).

"My question was what happened with you leaving the [Mormon] church? The only thing I seem to recall was that it had something to do with Paul Dunn. I am not trying to harass you, but if can spare a few pings back and forth with e-mail, I am curious about your experiences.

"If you are uncomfortable having dialogue whith a TBM about this (I doubt it, as I have seen you skin others alive with your quick wit), no problem. If so, perhaps if you have published your story somewhere and can point me to it, I would appreciate it.

"Thanks for your time!

"John L."

(John Lynch to Steve Benson, 13 October, 2005)


--My reply to Lynch:

"Please follow the advice of Susan, given to you on the board."

(Steve Benson to John Lynch, 13 October 2005)


--Lynch to me:

"Steve,

"I will most likely leave the exmo boards alone, at least for a while, as I do not want to create ill will, and I really am there just to learn.

"However, I am interested in hearing what happened with you. I promise I wont argue, or even challenge you (unless that is what you want, as you seem to be up for a bit of quick witted banter from time to time <smile>). I really just want to listen, though.

"Because of your family, you have some unique perspectives. I would like you to share them with me. I am not going to try and convert you, as that is not my place. I won't even disagree, if that would bother you.

"But, I would like to ask you questions. I have read your exchanges with, quite honestly, some people that were no match for you (you clearly have a quick wit and sharp intellect).

"However, they said some pretty harsh stuff, so I know you are thick skinned. Why not indulge a few of my questions, if only to educate me?

"Besides, if I am wrong for being a TBM, this is a chance for you to teach me <grin>. At the very least, it is a chance to help me understand you (assuming you care to be understood).

"I sincerely hope to hear from you soon.

"Regards,

"John Lynch "

(John Lynch to Steve Benson, 14 October 2005)


--My reply to Lynch:

"My advice still stands."

(Steve Benson to John Lynch, 14 October 2005)


--Lynch to me:

"Fair enough, Mr. Benson.

"I suppose that sensitive feelings are often easily protected behind barbed remarks and humor, but are difficult to protect in moments of serious dialogue. You are a remarkably gifted individual from what I have seen. I venture to guess that much of your genius emenates from your pain (they often say that artistic genius is).

"While I was not a party to what caused it, I can see that my status and beliefs no doubt refresh your memory of it. I sincerely pray that the ghosts of anguish that haunt you from troubled times will somehow be relieved, and that you will find the recovery your presence on the exmo boards hints that you seek.

"If you ever become willing to share your experience, if even to vent in anger, I will be a willing, safe, and non-judgmental ear.

"Kindest regards,

"John L."

(John Lynch to Steve Benson, 14 October 2005)
_____


When I posted Latter-day Lynch's e-mails on RfM, a series of behind-the-scenes investigations began more earnestly--ones bent on discovering the full identity of this "John Lynch" who had described himself to me as being "just a TBM" who had come to RfM merely "trying to learn."

Uh-huh.

Trouble for Lynch was, it wasn't that simple or that straight-forward.

Critical to unmasking this Latter-day Lone and Lying Ranger Stranger Danger was the detective work of RfM poster/computer whiz Tyson Dunn.

But Admin was quite aware at the time that Lynch was being deceptive, as well as knowingly violating the purpose and perimeter of the RfM forum.

As RfM Admininstrator Susan I/S notes:

"There is one other point to this: He [Lynch] knew this was not his room. We have made it very clear for MANY years this is an apologist-FREE zone. There is no way in hell he didn't know that. And that was exactly why he didn't say anything about who he really was.

". . . [T]hey [Lynch's posts on RfM] ran along the lines of, 'Oh, shucks, I just want to understand all'yall. In my job I need to relate to ex-Mos."

("There is one more point to this," posted by "Susan I/S," RfM Administrator, on "Recovery from Mormonism" bulletin board, 1 September 2011, 10:09 p.m., original emphasis)


To make a long story short on the digging that resulted in Lynch digging his own grave here, Tyson (along with help from other RfM posters, as well as from Admin) helped track the RfM Lynch to San Jose, California.

Indeed, this Lynched dude had reportedly identified himself as living in the "San Jose, CA mission," plus there was further identifying information provided courtesy of a BYU website, where a 2001 FAIR news update noted and quoted the following:

"Leaders of the Foundation of Apologetic Information and Research [FAIR] were at BYU on Jan. 16 and 17 in an effort to expand their organization.

"FAIR is an organization devoted to defending criticism of doctrine, practices and beliefs of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

"During their visit, President Scott Gordon [the same Scot Gordon referred to by David Twede] and Chairman John Lynch, both from California, made plans for an upcoming FAIR convention in Utah Valley this August and met with BYU faculty members.

"They also expressed a desire for articles submitted by BYU faculty, graduate and undergraduate students. . . .

"FAIR looks to affirm faith, not to destroy detractors," Lynch said. 'We want to be a resource for people to find answers.'

"Much of the material providing answers to anti-LDS literature, however, is often too scholarly for the lay member to easily understand, Lynch said.

"FAIR hopes to target this audience of lay members with articles that are less difficult to understand.

"We want to sift through scholarly works to get easily digestible, but still scholarly articles,' Lynch said."

("Leaders of FAIR organization seek BYU involvement," by Kathryn Richard (NewsNet staff writer), 18 January 2001, on "BYU NewsNet: Brigham Young University")

The trail was getting hotter.
_____


RFM EATS LYNCH'S LUNCH

Below is a summary of how Lynch eventually got himself lassoed on RfM, as described by a reader in John Dehlin's "Mormon Stories" commmentary section:

"[FAIR's Chairman John Lynch] conveniently forgot to mention during an hour-long podcast [on the 'Mormon Stories'] and in my opinion, took advantage of [the host's nice, congenial nature. I would not have him back on your show unless he agrees to answer questions about his behavior this past week on RfM and with Steve Benson in particular and why he omitted these facts.

"He used the same practice that the Mormon Church uses by revealing his name, but not who he really was or what his intentions really were. I guess those of us over on RfM, were not ready for the 'meat,' so he just gave us the 'milk,' his name that is.

"He lied to everyone and pretended to be somebody that he wasn't. He never told us that he was on the board at FAIR. Tyson Dunn, a poster on RfM, did some homework and discovered who John Lynch was and then revealed it to all the world.

"Finally, John Lynch revealed himself for who he really was, but only after he was caught. He then claimed that he never lied or was dishonest because he gave his real name, etc. All a joke in my opinion, just like him and his bogus organization.

"They should be renamed the 'CDFAIR.' He is a lying, dishonest guy that pretends to be an upright good guy. Remember, 'beware of the evil behind the smiling eyes!!' This clearly applies to John and his so-called organization that supposedly has no affiliation whatsoever with the Mormon Church. HA HA HA!! GOOD ONE!!

"He also lied when he said that he had tried to talk to Steve Benson and didn't even know where or how to find him. The 'real truth' is that he did have direct contact with Steve Benson all week long and emailed him through his email at the 'Arizona Republic.'

"They exchanged many e-mails back and forth as John Lynch continued to lie and conceal his true identity. Everybody go on over to RfM and type 'John Lynch' on the chat board search and you can read all about what I'm saying. It was like a soap opera over there . . . with this clown, AKA John Lynch. . . .

"What's amazing is that John Lynch wouldn't leave Steve Benson alone, even after he had asked him, politely and nicely, 3-4 times, to please leave him alone!! He just couldn't get the message. He kept writing more emails and more, again, as he lied about who he really was.

"He was like a typical Mormon Missionary and he wouldn't leave him alone and kept coming back and back again. Steve shared the personal e-mail correspondence with all of is and it is also over on RFM for those that want to read it all.

"Anyway, John D, this is the true character of your guest John Lynch. I just felt that everyone should know what his tactics are and how he functions in his private life. He is a lying, deceitful apologetic for the Mormon Church, period!! He's one of their hacks, plain and simple!!

"He does their dirty work so that they don't have to. His words indeed had no value once we all knew that he had been posting under false pretenses and LYING about who he really was.

"Besides, even if we knew who he was, his words had no value anyway. Most of us over there are cured of our Cognitive Dissonance while he is still deep in it and getting deeper everyday.

"He expected us to allow him on our board, asking probing questions, while at the same time, FAIR, his beloved organization where he sits on the board, would never and does not ever allow us EXMOS the same courtesy. . . . Bets anyone? I'd be gone in a heartbeat. I may just do it for fun and report back. We'll see how Mr. John Lynch treats us on his home turf.

"When we even try to do that over there, what he did on RfM, we are banned and our responses or posts are quickly deleted. John Lynch is a complete hypocrite as is his pathetic organization. John claimed to be an honest, active member of the Mormon Church but never disclosed who he represented. And people wonder why the Mormon Church has so many problems and why us EXMOS can't leave it alone. It appears that in this case, he couldn't leave us alone, doesn't it?

"Here was the first post by Mr. John Lynch over on RfM:

"'Subject: What are the rules?
'Date: Oct 11 [2005] 19:53
'Author: John Lynch . . .

"'My name is John Lynch. I understand that this is not a forum for the "defense of "the faith." However, I want to know under what circumstances I can participate. Am I allowed to ask questions? I have no desire to 'lurk' or otherwise hide my motives. I sincerely desire to understand the experiences of those that leave the church. I am an active member, with no personal crisis of faith I am dealing with.

"'Regards,

"'John L.'

"Did everyone catch that? He said, 'I have no desire to "lurk" or otherwise hide my motives.' Well, if that's the case, then maybe you should have told us who you were, John Lynch from the FAIR board, eh? I'm sorry John D, that this is so long but I felt that the truth needed to be told and exposed. This guy is a phony and a fraud and has no credibility whatsoever!!"

("Mormon Stories #007: 'Inside the Mind of a Mormon Apologist, Part 1,'" posted by "Samuel," 22 October 2005, at:
http://mormonstories.org/?p=29, original emphasis)


Giving primary credit where primary credit is due, RfMer "SL Cabbie" described Lynch's involuntary coming-out party on RfM this way:

"Tyson [Dunn] was the one who hung Lynch's scalp from his computer monitor."

("Tyson Was the One Who Hung . . .," post by "SL Cabbie," on "Recovery from Mormonism" bulletin board, 30 January 2011, at: http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,100176,100176)


Having been caught red-handed, Lynch's Mormon mission--not to mention his outting on this board as FAIR's Chair--has been described in this context:

"John Lynch is a critical member involved in the behind-the-scenes operations of the organization known as FAIR. Though he has tended to avoid the limelight, he's nonetheless figured into the world of Mopologetics in a number of significant ways. For example, he has been seen from time to time 'cruising' on RfM, oftentimes doling out what some posters characterized as 'condescension.'"

("The Encyclopedia of Moapolegetics," under "John Lynch: FAIR's Man Behind the Curtain," 1 March 2011)
_____


HUNG OUT TO DRY, LYNCH TRIES TO WRIGGLE OUT OF HIS LIE OF OMISSION

Having been pulled out into the sunlight against his will, Lynch later confessed to his fellow FAIR faithful his attempted undercover operation behind RfM's enemy lines (doing so in typical "poor-persecuted-me" spinmeister fashion that those having had any experience with schooled Mormon apologists have come to expect).

Lynch gave this selective version of events:

"A few years ago, I made a foray onto a message board for individuals who have left the Church. I was open in my identity both by name and also regarding my status as a full, believing member ('TBM' as they call us). I went there looking to learn, hoping that I might somehow gain some insight that would help us with people who have floundered in their faith. What I failed to do was identify my association with FAIR.

"I tried engaging in an email exchange with Steven Benson, grandson to President Benson and a nationally recognized cartoonist who famously left the Church. The result was Steve employing his journalistic skills and 'outing' me as a FAIR board member. I was banished and ridiculed as a 'troll' as if I was someone spying on their open message board with a hidden identity. But there were a few who witnessed my sincere and respectful efforts approached me independently and offered to share their experiences. . . .

"In the end, my foray amongst the disaffected ended in my banishment, not because of my affiliation with FAIR, but because the moderators felt I had violated a trust by not disclosing this information up front. In hindsight, I guess this should have been expected. Still, my kind comportment and respectful dialogue allowed me some choice opportunities to exchange thoughts and ideas with some few who could see that I was not there for anything other than sincere reasons. My lesson was reinforced, and I learned that the virtues of charity and patience can indeed create a dominion of influence where one would not have otherwise existed.

"What I learned was enlightening. I discovered that most who leave the church and associate on that web site do so because they perceive some violation of trust occurred. Perhaps there was a teaching they held that they found out to be false, and they could no longer trust a long time mentor to whom they had anchored their testimony. Perhaps the failings of a member created an offense, and the person could not reconcile their expectations with reality. When it is a leader that disappoints, it seems the sting is so much the greater. Perhaps they found an unflattering piece of history on the Church (ironically almost always directly or indirectly through some Church or Church-sponsored source), and they feel that the truth had not been told them. In all cases, the issue was that somehow they had an unmet expectation that resulted in feeling a trust they had granted someone or something had been violated."


While applauding what one Lynch critic described as Lynch's "sincere attempt to seek understanding" (NOT!), this same critic (RfM poster "Craig P@xton") pointed out to Lynch that sneak attacks launched against RfM by Mormonism's trained testifiers are neither condoned nor constructive:

" . . . I . . . understand how your failure to fully disclose your participation here at FAIR undermined the intent of your mission.

"The so-called disaffected feel the deepest sense of betrayal from LDS leadership. We placed the greatest trust in these leaders, only to discover that we had--to put it kindly--been fed a Disney version of reality. Ironically, the so-called anti-Mormon crowd actually became more credible than our own LDS leaders.

"Your failure to fully disclose your background played into those feelings of abuse and betrayal. You only reconfirmed that representatives from your camp cannot be fully trusted. I think you blew a real opportunity to build a bridge of understanding."

(John Lynch, "Forays Amongst the Disaffected," on "FAIR BLOG: Defending Mormonism," 13 July 2009; and "Cr@ig P@xton Says," on "FAIR BLOG: Defending Mormonism," July 2009, both at: http://www.fairblog.org/2009/07/13/forays-amongst-the-disaffected-2/)


One of RfM's favorite posters has tried to cut Lynch some slack. Tal Bachman, in observing how nice Lynch was to him, noted what appears to be Lynch's modus operandi: fishing around for certain ex-Mormons to have a "friendly" chat with.

Tal writes:

"I've gotten e-mails from people all over the world asking me about the [Mormon] church, many of whom, after some conversation, have come to acknowledge the truth (although some have decided to stay in the church for social or family reasons).

"I've gotten emails from 'official' and amateur Mormon apologists, who all (I found) rely on the same mind games I used to play on myself to keep believing.

"Incidentally, the only one of these guys who seemed like a decent guy was John Lynch from FAIR. I know others on here have a different opinion, but that was my experience. I understand he is still doing his best to defend Joseph's untrue claims, and he may always do this; even under the most optimal circumstances, you don't just come to see that your entire life was built on a fraud in a couple of weeks, or months, or even years. Sometimes it takes a long, long time, if it happens at all. It is especially hard once you've taken a public stand; not because you consciously don't want to 'lose face,' but (I think) because largely unconscious forces, seeking to protect us from pain, loss of status, etc., make it almost impossible to see what's really there."

(Tal Bachman, "The Beginning Of A Long Goodbye," 24 July 2006)


Tal is certainly right on one thing: Lynch lost face, big-time, when he tried to creep on to RfM under a false face. (Recall Lynch's cooing, deceptive assurances given here on RfM: "Am I allowed to ask questions? I have no desire to 'lurk' or otherwise hide my motives").

Door #3, Brother Lynch: Telestial Kingdomville, where the liars hang out.

And RfM poster "Craig P@xton" is right, as well. Earth to Lynch: "[Y]ou blew a real opportunity to build a bridge of understanding."

Heh. He sure as hell did.

It would help if Lynch would understand--and then do--what Mormons are taught not to understand and not to do: namely, to understand the truth and then to tell it.

What a concept.


It would also help if Lynch would understand that he can't tramp around in my emails, around RfM or around "The Daily Beast" as "John L." It has that certain smell.

What a slow learner. :)

http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,647139,647139#msg-647139



Edited 32 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2012 01:29PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Don Bagley ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 06:02PM

Another insightful piece by Steve Benson. The apologists reveal their belief that all's FAIR in their secret war.

The truth will out.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Tupperwhere ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 06:10PM

The truth IS out. It's all about spreading the word now which I have and will continue to do anywhere and everywhere I possibly can. Thanks for the boost in motivation John L!

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: WinksWinks ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 06:12PM

That's rather threatening, to say that about having a bomb strapped to him. They imply fall out and damages, but who will cause the damage?
Truth is not injurious. Perhaps it is a harsh spotlight, but lies hurt and kill people. Not truth.

I take that back. Truth may hurt a liar. He's projecting his fears onto Mr. Twede.
*snicker*

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Mormoney ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 07:32PM

You're a trooper Mr. Benson, I salute you. Your insight and study of these issues is incredible.

I wonder if FAIR might have more credibility if their apologetic responses weren't laiden with responses to problems that start with something to the tune of "Well yeah but...". These guys are the equivalent of the big tobacco science departments that are essentially out to disprove that tobacco smoke is unhealthy. They base their garbage apologetics on crackpot science. The reason it was so easy for me go from a TBM to resigned in 6 months (all this year) was because FAIR's responses to problems were such that I would expect to hear when defending the indefensible. So even from my former TBM perspective, FAIR just wasn't good enough. And I think they know it.

I must say though that this war of words is truly intriguing and love watching all this unfold, and thank you Steve for keeping us all posted.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: John_Lyle ( )
Date: October 13, 2012 12:39PM

"Well, yeah..." matches the passage in 1 Nephi where the phrase "sort of" was used...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Charlie ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 08:09PM

Now I feel like George Nori. We are in the last of days and I know it because of fair. The antichrist has been born and his name is Steve Benson.

All I can say is that they certainly get whiney when called out.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 08:11PM


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2012 08:12PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Susan I/S ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 08:36PM

Snake in a bunny suit. I have never seen anyone work so hard at trying to convince us how warm and fuzzy he was. He seemed quite shocked when Tyson outed him and he was asked to leave. After all, he was being so NICE!
http://dragonseyehauntedbarn.blogspot.com/2008/09/peter-rottentail.html

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 08:41PM


Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2012 12:28PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Nightingale ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 09:18PM

Back when I was a neophyte poster at RfM and still in my Rodney King period, thinking we could all be friends, no matter our differences, someone from FAIR - I believe it was John Lynch - "rewrote" an RfM post to replace the word 'Mormon' with 'Jew', attempting to illustrate that our thoughts expressed here are "hate speech" or "anti" at best. It was then and is still now the most egregious example of poor judgement, at best, that I have seen from any poster of any stripe. How does manufacturing a paragraph of anti-Semitic comments make any valid points in the context of Mormons vs ex-Mormons, especially when ex-members are not monolithic and usually do not frame their position as "us v them", unlike many Mormons and Mormon thought with regard to former members.

I replied, saying that his post would "live in infamy". I admit to writing an overly dramatic statement, although that does not detract from my sincerely and deeply felt distaste for the anti-Semitic rewrite he had done. (If the author was not John Lynch, I apologize for a faulty memory after all this time). He/they reprinted his post and my response at FAIR, laughing at my "infamy" comment.

What I meant was that his post was so exaggerated as to be ridiculous. It was a thought-stopper rather than an honest attempt to engage in healthy debate. Worse, it was in itself anti-Semitic and I couldn't see any good reason for such a response. I don't see, still, how writing overtly anti-Semitic comments is an acceptable form of "defending the faith" or whatever he thought he was doing.

I was still at the point then of trying to understand FAIR's position and believing that the church's spokespeople and apologists were honest and fair and knowledgeable, or tried to be. I still wanted to engage with courtesy and kindness.

Now we have John Lynch likening Steve Benson to Osama bin Laden, until recently the most wanted man, and most hated terrorist, for his heavy involvement at a leadership level in the atrocity of 9/11, among other evil deeds.

Really?

Benson aka bin Laden?

Could we get a more exaggerated comparison or more egregious statement?

It is beyond belief, literally. When I first read a few weeks back Steve's reference to being called "bin Laden" I had to go and see it for myself. I just could not believe that someone would make such a ridiculous comparison.

It is not funny. It is not understandable. It is gross hyperbole. It is beyond ridiculous. It is appalling.

John Lynch. You need to take a deep breath, a step back, and give your head a good hard shake. You go too far. I have always thought that making Nazi comparisons without merit is outrageous and destroys the credibility of the person who does so. Now, what can we possibly make of a person like Lynch who would compare one's fellow American, a knowledgeable person, an honourable man, Steve Benson, with a terrorist who was an FBI Most Wanted criminal for more than a decade? Why? Because Steve happened to be born into a Mormon family and as an adult developed different beliefs and took another path? He left a church that he didn't choose and talks freely about his new beliefs and yes, his criticism of the faith in which he found himself growing up, through no choice of his own (despite the Mormon belief in the pre-existence).

John Lynch doesn't like what Steve Benson has to say and suddenly Benson is bin Laden?

I'd say Lynch is kidding or had a brain spasm when he chose that comparison or even that his mind is incontinent at the worst possible times or - what? What could possibly cause a person to seriously make such a statement? Over-zealous defence of the faith? Nasty personality? Misplaced loyalty? Fanatical belief?

If it's not an offence at law to be likened to a top terrorist, with a bomb reference thrown in (no pun intended, definitely) it damn well should be!

John Lynch - defence of the faith gone too far. No wonder many ex-members refer to the un-FAIR-ites who seek to protect their church by any means FAIR or FOUL (Foundation full of Uncouth Loudmouths).

I'd be ashamed of such protectors of the faith were I still a member. As an ex-member I'm shocked, appalled, disbelieving that a senior apologist could be so lacking in judgement, so off-base, so unFAIR to another human, no matter his beliefs or history or actions.

bin Laden is bin Laden (or was, thankfully).

He had no connection or similarity to Steve Benson.

Try again, John Lynch. And this time try harder. Unless you want to continue going along the pitiful path your protection of the faith takes you down.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2012 09:23PM by Nightingale.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 09:26PM


Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2012 09:41PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Susan I/S ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 10:37PM

Eric is Satin ;). Even after all these years that just cracks me up.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 10:41PM

. . . he lets Susan I/S run a tough board while he is satin smooth. :)



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2012 11:07PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Taddlywog ( )
Date: October 13, 2012 11:13AM

Like the Van Helsings (Dracula) of Mormonism. From the outside they seem more like Javert caricatures ( Les Miserables).

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: John_Lyle ( )
Date: October 13, 2012 12:45PM

Anyone ever hear of Godwin's Law?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Although calling someone 'Osama Bin Laden' is not a technical violation of the law, but it qualifies in spirit, at least...

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Dave the Atheist ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 09:55PM

I'm curious as to whom supplies the money for Lynch's paycheck.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 09:59PM


Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2012 10:34PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: GNPE ( )
Date: October 11, 2012 10:48PM

The LIES started with Joe, the subject then was polygamy.

they haven't stopped since, only now sometimes it's a bit more subtle, disguised.

Hinckley was 5 X 5 (Ham jargon) within the tradition; nearly everything substatial he said was an Insult to truth-telling, truth-Loving people.

Apparently, they've got TSM muzzled,

Pass the Popcorn, there will be more along anytime.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: jong1064 ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 02:05AM

So, Steve, I'm curious. Why is John Lynch so determined to bring you down? Is there a reward at the COB for whomever brings the very misguided Bro Benson back to the fold? Or did you do something really mean to him in the pre-existence? And if I were David Twede I would be even more offended because he basically called him a blind sheep, willing to follow a terrorist in exchange for 40 or 50 virgins in the next life.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 11:23AM

. . . or, rather, more accurately, I suspect that his basic personality emerged for the rest of us to see. He was caught red-handed in his deceit and unmasked in his identity and is probably desperately angry about that fact. As a result of having his hood ripped off, he's been on the Danite warpath against RfM, myself and others here ever since.

Poor guy. I think that deep down Lyin' Lynch knows he's up to his neck in the deception business and is probably feeling a lot of self-loathing at this point for having been sucked up in what he won't openly admit is his lifetime devotion to a massive fraud. Rather than face up and own up, he's frantically trying to justify his corrupted choice to lie for the Lord by deflecting his gaze from that cold, hard reality through immersing himself even deeper in a losing war against those who have exposed him and his Cult.

He's one twisted--and twisted up--fellow.



Edited 13 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2012 05:01PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: forbiddencokedrinker ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 06:21AM

So how long until FAIR says that Steve Benson was in Dallas, standing on that grassy knoll with a rifle back on Nov. 22, 1963?

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 13, 2012 04:06AM


Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/13/2012 04:06AM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: John_Lyle ( )
Date: October 13, 2012 12:54PM

The Church would have sent an angel with a flaming sword to Dallas to commit a very public crime, with plausible deniability - "It wasn't our angel, our angel threatens to kill people when JS wants to sleep with their wives."

(Wouldn't this annoy the conspiracy theories?)

Or, this happened:

http://www.metafilter.com/9205/Features-your-computer-ought-to-have

We just might be wrong, maybe all this is product of some spiteful god sitting at a computer, just waiting to smite all us heretics... Lynch and Gordon are here just to remind us that they will not go easily into that good night...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/13/2012 12:56PM by John_Lyle.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: brigantia ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 06:40AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: twojedis ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 09:45AM

@Steve, I think you should consider writing longer posts with more information. :P

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 11:17AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: jong1064 ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 01:50PM

Nobody can say Steve doesn't do his homework.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: steve benson ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 04:58PM

I bet he wears his CTR ring in his nose, in order to make it easier for him to be led around.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2012 04:59PM by steve benson.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: twojedis ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 09:48PM

Hahahaha! CTR ring in his nose. I almost spit my drink on my laptop.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: Mia ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 05:04PM

I can't imagine being John Lynch. Being inside his head must be like going to lunch at the insane asylum. Nothing is as it seems.

Options: ReplyQuote
Posted by: alx71ut ( )
Date: October 12, 2012 05:10PM

Suppose that Romney loses and that he also doesn't win Florida's 29 electoral votes. How will that loss by a France mission alumnus Romney be felt by a former France mission president (who doesn't like mishies having Hotmail or them wanking off) who now happens to be Brother Twede's Stake President? It could be revenge time for the TBM's and time to make sure Brother Twede loses the blessing of being able to pay tithing to LDS inc. and to wear the sacred underwear that'll help him feel warm during a chilly Florida summer. Well it's a good thing that Twede now knows the real scoop on Steve Benson from the ever super righteous Brother John Lynch :)

Now in all seriousness .... these Monsonite Mormons just don't see reality.

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed. Please start another thread and continue the conversation.