Posted by:
cludgie
(
)
Date: November 28, 2012 03:09PM
Please note that the one announcement reads:
"Earlier this month, the Church created a new stake in Spain. The Lleida Spain Stake was created from the Hospitalet Spain Stake and Spain Barcelona Mission and includes four wards (Lleida, Sabadell 1st, Sabadell 2nd, and Terrassa) and three branches (Andorra, Zaragoza 1st, and Zaragoza 2nd). Missionaries serving in the Spain Barcelona Mission report that the two branches in Zaragoza may become wards within the near future. Currently the Hospitalet Spain Stake has only four wards and two branches. With few wards in either stake, it appears that the decision to create the new stake in Lleida was under the expectation that some branches in both of these stakes will mature into wards and that some wards may divide to create additional units."
It's hard to know what this means. Normally, when I see that a new stake has been "created," it's usually because to other stakes have been combined, i.e., 2 minus 1 equals 1. No matter that you now have one less stake, it is universally (within Mormonism) seen as "success." Also, I have lived through this kind of thing before where they cobble together a small stake out of only a few wards and one or two branches, and then expect good things. The branches will turn into wards! The wards will divide into two! I have NEVER seen this work, and at some point in the future, the ailing stake will be reabsorbed into another stake which will be given a new name, and voila!--you now have *drum rolls* ANOTHER NEW STAKE! It seems to me to be a constant shell game to confuse the public and the members. They can never just let it alone because that would indicate a stale, static situation in which the church does not appear to be growing.
Situations in which the church DOES grow (places like in the Congo) is also pretty dodgy. One has to inspect just why it grows there, and to what end. Using the and Republic of Congo and DR Congo as examples, it grows there for several reasons: They really, really believe in magic and sorcery, so the Joseph Smith story really resonates in a way that is difficult for us to comprehend; they lead rough lives, and the nice buildings that the church builds gives them respite on a Sunday, but moreover, it has electricity and a bunch of outlets--something they don't have at home, so they can sleep in sacrament meeting while letting their phones charge (I kid you not, that is a huge draw that gets people out); you get to hang out with old white American people, which is also a weird, huge draw.
Getting missionaries to serve is so easy there. It is a chance for a boy or girl to leave home for a couple of years and have an income. They even get to train in a different country (Ghana), which means getting a passport and flying on a real live airplane. After that, they get to live in real flats for two years with a door, a flush toilet and possibly electricity. This presents its own problems for the church, however, since there is no real return except for numbers, which, I guess, is its own prize. But otherwise, the missionaries are just a financial liability, bringing in the poorest of the poor. And these impoverished missionaries carry out shenanigans during their missions that you don't see among the First Worlders. For instance, quite a few Congolese see their missions as a time in which they can afford what they haven't been able to up to now, like marriage to their girlfriend. They've often done this with full knowledge and even complicity of their mission companion.
Anyway, point is, none of this truly means anything. It may, in fact, just point to an increasing failures.