Posted by:
munchybotaz
(
)
Date: January 29, 2013 02:49AM
You may recall the recent thread here about geneticist Dr. George Church seeking "an adventurous female" to give birth to a cloned Neanderthal baby. Turns out his statements from an interview with Der Spiegel were misinterpreted and sensationalized. Maybe he was misquoted; I'd go back and look, but I'm on mobile and it's a huge pain.
Dr. Church got a bunch of flak, apparently, and now says this:
"'The public should be able to detect cases where things seem implausible,' Church said in an interview at his office at Harvard Medical School in Boston. 'Everybody's fib detector should have been going off. They should have said, ‘What? Who would believe this?' ... This really indicates that we should have scientific literacy.'"
http://m.yahoo.com/w/legobpengine/news/neanderthal-cloning-chatter-highlights-scientific-illiteracy-051317850.html?.b=index&.ts=1359440926&.intl=US&.lang=enMy thought upon reading that article was, "@#%&*! Fooled again!" What was that I was just saying about sucking it up like Hoover.
I did doubt that a Neanderthal could be recreated--wondered if it was possible on a couple of counts, and even considered the story might be bogus. Mostly, though, I just thought it was a terrible idea and, in the end, mostly believed it.
Better late than never, the Yahoo! story made me curious enough to go looking for the Der Spiegel interview. It's a very worthwhile and I think amazing read. (On edit) I thought it seemed long when I read it on my phone, but now that I'm on my PC I see it's really not:
http://m.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/a-877634.html#spRedirectedFrom=www&referrrerSure sounds to me like Dr. Church believes it's possible to clone a Neanderthal, and like he wants and maybe even intends to try. I'm feeling less foolish, but it's always a good idea to follow up on those pesky little doubts and learn some things.
Edited 6 time(s). Last edit at 01/29/2013 11:30AM by munchybotaz.