Posted by:
katuwiran
(
)
Date: March 14, 2013 12:11PM
From his tweets:
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/311774201012948992"With respect to those meanings of "human" that
are relevant to the morality of abortion, any
fetus is less human than an adult pig"
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/311787421354319872"The most important moral question in abortion
debate is "Can it feel pain?" Late abortuses
may, but you don't have to be human to feel pain"
---------
Christopher Hitchens, my favorite atheist, was
wrong. Religion doesn't poison everything.
Darwinism does. Just read the Darwinist logic
above from Dawkins.
When we humans butcher animals or harvest
plants in order to consume them or otherwise
expand our scientific knowledge, we cause
these living creatures pain. But this is not
immoral.
Killing another human being is immoral.
Killing a fetus is not abortion, it is feticide.
Abortion is just a euphemism for an immoral act.
Once we use the correct word for the action,
we get a better understanding of that action.
You can kill another human without causing
pain. But does painless killing change the act
in any way? No. If you have ever planned on
killing someone with such provision, the fact
that you have prepared it beforehand makes it
murder.
Darwinists like Dawkins makes eugenics easy to
swallow. And that is how they've really
poisoned everything.