Posted by:
Nightingale
(
)
Date: April 30, 2013 02:11PM
On a recently closed thread, fiona64 asks:
“…as a never-mo, can someone help me understand this: a rape *victim* is being held responsible by TSCC for what happened to her? Really?“
fiona's post:
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,878648,879189#msg-879189Here’s the original thread (all the best to “kitnb1” - I hope the responses you received were of some help to you:)
kitnb1:
http://exmormon.org/phorum/read.php?2,878648,878648#msg-878648Here’s the answer (in a nutshell: Yes, in Mormonism it’s blame the victim time – check out the stats for failure to report sexual attacks – 90% as late as 2003):
http://www.i4m.com/think/sexuality/mormon_sex_purity.htmAdd to this culture of "blame the victim" the reality in the Mormon Church of "calling" untrained men as leaders and advisors, which can only make things much worse for members who feel they must go only to their church leaders for help even in crisis situations. Then you get the plumber giving marital advice, the printer hearing "confessions", the pool guy advising a rape victim, and using church "handbooks" to guide him (as he doesn't have a clue himself) in spouting off the church's line about how much culpability the person who was attacked bears and how it's best to keep the incident quiet; i.e., not report it to civil authorities.
This has been written in church handbooks and publications by Mormon prophets and other top leaders. It may also be so ingrained in the culture that it partially comes from the "unwritten" handbook; i.e., word of mouth, general observation on how things are done, personal experience of same, and other more ephemeral ways in which "the way it's done" is handed down, part of tradition, just the way it is.
I wonder sometimes if this partly explains why bishops began to ask such personal and intrusive questions of the unfortunate "victims" in their offices. We have to find out, after all, how much blame is attached to the victim.
This inappropriate questioning happened to my convert friend, who had an affair with a missionary and both were disfellowshipped (yes, she accepts that in this case she did a terrible wrong). But so did they, the day they convened their church court and three men questioned her unmercifully about all the details - how often, where, when, why, how, and even more intrusive questions until she was a sobbing heap on the floor. If you ask them, they will say they are just doing their job. And I saw some who seemed so afraid themselves that they weren't carrying out their jobs to the nth degree. The bishop in the ward I attended, for instance, asking me personal questions prior to getting a TR, blushing and apologizing as he did so, but saying he had to "follow the book".
Everybody trying to do the right thing. Following the leader without independent thought and room to be different can lead to terrible abuses in and of itself.
One can only hope that recent events in the Catholic Church, for instance, have caused a change in how the Mormon Church handles crises like incidents of rape in their own often-closed circles. But as it's been part of their culture for generations, training their members to seek counsel only from local leaders, keeping tight reins on those leaders, and keeping non-Mormon authorities and experts outside the loop, it's still a reality that persons who have suffered attacks, abuse and other outrages do not get the help they need. First, their local leaders are not trained to handle such issues and second, they are all strongly discouraged (or have been until very recently, if that has even changed slightly) from seeking outside help. This is especially true when it comes to reporting abusers to outside authorities.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/30/2013 02:21PM by Nightingale.