Posted by:
Chucky
(
)
Date: May 20, 2013 06:03PM
I use to believe all the pro-Mormon and anti-Mormon writings about Smith being a hound dog for girls and having his way with them and their being lots of love kids etc.
I then came across an article long ago by a scientist in the DNA field who was Mormon and he said he wanted to find these love children Smith fathered. He spent over a decade doing research and testing of all the "claimed" descendants written about in books for a century and their living descendants. No DNA matches. All the hype by pro and con Mormons had been a bunch of white washed lies. In some cases the real parentage was found.
That info bothered me. How could so many people, the very wives themselves claiming to have had a love child by Smith and relatives and friends claiming the same be so wrong for over a century?
So I looked up a list of his wives.
http://wivesofjosephsmith.org/Between 1841 and 1843 Smith supposedly married to himself 31 'spiritual' wives everyone, pro and con thought he was sexually romancing.
That would mean/insinuate if he had sex just two times a day, 340 days a year(I excluded some days for sickness etc)for three years that's be 1,020 times for sexual intercourse. And no kids. And the only wife of at least 35 (Emma included) that constantly was having kids with Smith was Emma.
So my question then and now is how does a purported sex hound, marrying 31 wives in a three year period for the purpose of sex only achieve children with one wife?
I have come to realize I had been a 'lemming' of information and had never questioned the actual existing evidence. Now that I have seen and reviewed this 'extra' information I had never thought to inquire about, I no longer follow the common thought that Smith was a sex hound and sexing 30 plus wives in just a three year period with no 'evident' kids except by the first wife and they were constantly having kids throughout their marriage.
Just something to consider...