So the morg wants to come after our part member families and inactive families. Lets fight back. I would be really grateful if someone could provide some pamphlets that have real church history, for example a list of js wiv are es with ages and quotes about how they were coerced/manipulated into marrying him. I have seen the christian ones they put out to witness to mormons, but they are not really what i was looking for. I really, really want to make sure that this new stalking program bites them in the butt.

I'm thinking a pamphlet from one of their very own witnesses to their Book of Mormon ... David Whitmer . Powerful stuff .

Sounds good, perhaps we can drop them off while visiting teaching, maybe with a sample of coffee or a bottle of wine.

Why doesn't the non member part/less active just say no, mean no, and enforce no?

Handing out pro truth literature to people coming by my house does enforce no. How many people are going to come back and keep bugging us if we turn around and use their own tricks against them. Its a good solution.

This page by itself is good:
http://www.wivesofjosephsmith.org/

The stories included are even better. I was very affected by the Zina Huntington and Helen Kimball stories.

The Letter to a CES Director has some pages that would make good pamphlets to pass out, like pages 19, 21-23, 32, 39.

http://mormonthink.com/personalstories/A_Letter_to_a_CES_Director.pdf

For a Mormon who is a good researcher and curious, this polygamy timeline could be interesting to show them and let them check the facts on:

http://www.i4m.com/think/polygamy/JS_Polygamy_Timeline.htm

These are all really good ideas, thanks!

I'd print off one or both of the following:

http://mormonthink.com/personalstories/A_Letter_to_a_CES_Director.pdf

http://packham.n4m.org/tract.htm

The Tanner bookstore also has tons of pamphlets. They are former Mormon turned Christian, but most of their stuff is historical, not Biblical crap.

Perhaps a summary of Steve Hassan's rubrics on how to identify a mind-control cult. It is an objective source that does not specifically shout out "Mormons!! This is you!", so they may not reject it completly out of hand and direct "anti" material. It becomes difficult to deny the obvious correlation.