Recognizing notable people who impede public health efforts, and aid the spread of contagious diseases



https://hermancainmedal.com/

Herman Cain, 2011:

"We need a leader, not a reader" (audience cheers)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2jXzwp1ZLU

(0:57)

OMG. Pray for brains.

lol whoopsies

He is a very stable covfefe.

What another one?

youtube.com/watch?v=9-rfoROC9PE Montoursville Pa

Awwww. Shucky Ducky!

Twitter blocks content and has to change policy with egg on cyber face from possibly major error..

Seems big tech gets recognized as corrupted in the sense of forwarding only one side, promoting or propping up weak and ultimately doomed cause.

https://apnews.com/article/business-media-social-media-censorship-ec529ef85c1e72cefe0ae9450e118b9c

How many times has somebody on this Board wisecracked, "I consulted the great god Google," or something to that effect? In many ways,, the major tech deities serve as high priests--interlocutors between us peons and the truth that they want to dispense. Yes, they do filter it, going so far as to deplatform those who, even blocking major newsoutlets, candidates, parties, and recently, a US government agency!

Usually, its a vague "You have violated our terms of service..." With no contact information or avenue of redress. Then the account owner has to jump through hoops to get their account back up and running. People and parties with established clout make out better than others.

https://nypost.com/cover/october-29-2020/

I think we've had enough of being told what to read, or not, in a cult.*

*In generations past, Christian Science exercised that control over its members. Much, much less nowaadays.

That's pretty funny. You guys link to two articles on Twitter and you use them as evidence against Google.

Lot's Wife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's pretty funny. You guys link to two
> articles on Twitter and you use them as evidence
> against Google.

Don't be so numb. Oh boy do I ever have evidence of terrble big tech millenials interference..

I know, I know. GOP epistemology: if it's in the ballpark, one can construe it anyway he wants and pretend it's on point. Sort of like Mormon epistemology.

Congratulations.

Lot's Wife Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know, I know. GOP epistemology: if it's in the
> ballpark, one can construe it anyway he wants and
> pretend it's on point. Sort of like Mormon
> epistemology.
>
> Congratulations.

I'm not trying on a condescending attitude, am I? Why would I?

"Don't be so numb."

On the substance, I think the tech giants need aggressive legislation. You and I may disagree on why, but it's ridiculous to have aging adolescents deciding what information voters should have.

Aging adolescent attitudes involved in more possibly modern sway attempts might be happening, who's to really say? It's a historic storyline nevertheless that is on Dan Bongino's news feed. I know I know, who the hell is Dan Bongino hah..



Dan Bongino@dbongino·
18 hours ago
If Donald Trump wins again, despite
-Twitter
-Facebook
-Google
-The entire mainstream media
-The deep staters in the intell community
-The Hollywood hate machine
-and the cancel culture libs,
it’ll be the greatest political story ever told. Flag of United States"