Posted by:
schrodingerscat
(
)
Date: March 07, 2021 05:29PM
This week POtUS said Texas and Mississippi governors cancelling Covid restrictions 100% was "Neanderthal thinking".
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/04/biden-mask-mandate-texas-neanderthal-thinking-greg-abbottBut recent discoveries indicate Neanderthals, one of our nearest cousins in the Hominid species, were also our cognitive equals and maybe even smarter than us. They had bigger brains than us.
https://www.sapiens.org/column/field-trips/neanderthal-brain/#:~:text=A%202018%20study%20used%20CT,than%20those%20of%20modern%20humans.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00445-xBernard Wood explores a claim that our nearest cousins were our cognitive equals — and that birds had a part to play in that.
he Smart Neanderthal: Bird Catching, Cave Art, and the Cognitive Revolution Clive Finlayson Oxford University Press (2019)
The stereotype of Neanderthals as uncreative and unintelligent is remarkably persistent. In The Smart Neanderthal, archaeologist Clive Finlayson challenges that view. His assessment is informed by archaeological evidence, including his own decades-long research on groups of Homo neanderthalensis that lived on and around the Rock of Gibraltar from 125,000 to just over 30,000 years ago. Intriguingly, birds form a significant part of his argument.
Finlayson, director of the Gibraltar Museum since 1991, takes aim at researchers who have interpreted the archaeological record of Neanderthals as suggesting that the species never attained the brain power of contemporary Homo sapiens. Sure, Neanderthals get marks for surviving at a time when the cold climate brought tundra conditions to most of Europe. But the conventional wisdom is that the modern humans who moved into Europe soon after leaving Africa some time in the past 50,000 to 70,000 years had already raised their cognitive game a notch or two, thus enabling them to prosper and eventually outwit their Neanderthal cousins.
Gibraltar lies at the southwestern edge of Neanderthals’ geographical range. Finlayson argues that discoveries his team has made at four main cave sites suggest that the species’ behavioural repertoire was more sophisticated than the popular caricature suggests. He says that the Neanderthals living there had access to, and took advantage of, a much wider range of resources than their northerly cousins, including rich avian biodiversity. And he posits that an archaeologist not familiar with animal behaviour would be unable to decipher the Gibraltar Neanderthals’ cognitive parity with modern humans.
When Neanderthals occupied the Gibraltar caves, sea levels were lower. The hominins shared their habitat with a much wider variety of animals, particularly birds, than is seen today. Fragile bird bones survive well in the relatively protected atmospheres of caves, and the fossils recovered sample 160 avian species. That covers 30% of the avian species known from Europe for the time, ranging from the pine grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator, a finch), to ducks, choughs, larks, gannets, eagles and vultures. Finlayson suggests that tool marks left on the bones indicate that some of the species on Gibraltar were processed for food or, more controversially, for their feathers. He reminds us that birds come in many shapes and sizes, with a variety of behaviours and responses to humans, which implies that their exploitation would have required sophisticated knowledge. But he goes further, arguing that this knowledge was comparable to that drawn on by modern birders.
Not all of Finlayson’s inferences (including this one) are logically sound, and The Smart Neanderthal would have benefited from some editorial ‘tough love’. His point about the neglect of avian evidence is well taken, however. So is his reflection that most of the humdrum things we do daily do not necessarily reflect our cognitive potential. His findings from Gibraltar — with those by anthropologist Dirk Hoffmann and his colleagues suggesting that Neanderthals decorated the walls of three caves in Spain — might have exposed a cognitively advanced side of our Neanderthal cousins.
But in the end they went extinct and we didn't, which might be what PotUS was talking about when he called something he sees as an existential threat, "Neanderthal thinking".
I wonder why they went extinct if they had bigger brains than us?
I read a book about the Neanderthals that theorized they went extinct about the same time we domesticated dogs. So it might have been our symbiotic relationship with domesticated wolves that helped us both thrive and adapt to change and out compete the Neanderthals who were apparently better friends with the birds than the wolves.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/150304-neanderthal-shipman-predmosti-wolf-dog-lionfish-jagger-pogo-ngbooktalkEdited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/07/2021 05:34PM by schrodingerscat.