Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: MJ ( )
Date: February 21, 2012 07:07PM

Though I still see an effort to twist some facts, this seems like a remarkably unbiased article to be coming from KSL:

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=757&sid=19260592

I say that the author has twisted some facts, an example is where he says "However, up until a few recent cases, legal precedent has not considered marriage a fundamental right and has not seen fit to classify it as a right guaranteed for every American" First it does not matter if it was recent or not, if the supreme court has ruled that marriage is a fundamental right, than that is a ruling of the court. Since 1888, the Supreme Court of the USA has ruled that marriage is a fundamental right. Yeah, over a hundred and thirty years ago is "recent" in USA history and 14 Supreme Court rulings rulings is "a few"!

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Your Email (optional): 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **        **  **    **  **         **      ** 
 ***   ***        **  ***   **  **    **   **  **  ** 
 **** ****        **  ****  **  **    **   **  **  ** 
 ** *** **        **  ** ** **  **    **   **  **  ** 
 **     **  **    **  **  ****  *********  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **    **  **   ***        **   **  **  ** 
 **     **   ******   **    **        **    ***  ***