Recovery Board  : RfM
Recovery from Mormonism (RfM) discussion forum. 
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Posted by: MJ ( )
Date: February 21, 2012 07:07PM

Though I still see an effort to twist some facts, this seems like a remarkably unbiased article to be coming from KSL:

http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=757&sid=19260592

I say that the author has twisted some facts, an example is where he says "However, up until a few recent cases, legal precedent has not considered marriage a fundamental right and has not seen fit to classify it as a right guaranteed for every American" First it does not matter if it was recent or not, if the supreme court has ruled that marriage is a fundamental right, than that is a ruling of the court. Since 1888, the Supreme Court of the USA has ruled that marriage is a fundamental right. Yeah, over a hundred and thirty years ago is "recent" in USA history and 14 Supreme Court rulings rulings is "a few"!

Options: ReplyQuote
Go to Topic: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In


Screen Name: 
Subject: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **   *******   **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  ***   **  **     **  ***   ***  **     ** 
 **     **  ****  **  **     **  **** ****  **     ** 
 ********   ** ** **   ********  ** *** **  **     ** 
 **     **  **  ****         **  **     **   **   **  
 **     **  **   ***  **     **  **     **    ** **   
 ********   **    **   *******   **     **     ***