1. It is an event where you CANNOT wear them, so don't. Such events include swimming, sports, and sex. 2. Pretend you have spent the day in an event where you cannot wear them, (i.e. the pool), and you're going to take a shower at the first opportunity at which point you will put your garments back on. Stall. 3. Pretend you have your period really heavy and need to wear panties that hold a pad for a change. 4. Pretend all your garments are in the laundry and as soon as you wash them, they'll be back on you. 5. (any other reasons you've used??...add here)
She probably just pulls the front down. The sweetheart neckline goes lower than others. I was able to wear low cut shirts. Just as long as my shoulders were covered, I was "modest".
Don't you understand? Ann Romney, and saintly Mormons like my saintly mother, before she became more saintly and left the church, are so righteous, that they wear a special garment that can only be seen with the spiritual eye. It clings to the skin, can never be removed, and is given to them by the three Nephites, riding upon the back of Cureloms, in person. This new garment is so sacred, that regular garments can not be worn over them, unless they mock the sacredness, of the super invisible garment. If you were truly righteous you would be able to see them on her.
I'm sure that the news stand daily's like the national enquirer will be paying a handsome fee for a sneak photo at the 1st Lady of Kolobs magic undies.
Actually, if you're a pretty busty lady, and you get the garments to fit your boobs instead of your shoulders, you can get away with lower necklines fairly easily. Of course, you'll have more garment in other places.
Ick. The very thought of those things makes me ill.
Probably not, but could be. Seriously, I'm not saying she's a model of Mormon modesty, but just in virtue of my body type I was able to wear a lot of clothes that most Mormon would consider immodest-- like cleavage galore and skirts to mid thigh. My cousins always tucked and pinned, but I didn't even have to do that- the g's just didn't fit as intended. So I felt like as long as I was covering the garment I could wear what I wanted, but I'm sure judgey Mormons thought I was cheating.
I wore clothes that had that kind of neckline with garments. She is not showing any cleavage either. The fabric seems to be opaque so there is no indication of underwear lines. That was my preferred way to dress also. Never show off what is underneath! :-)
None of those dresses were without sleeves. Garments are below cleavage level, about even with the bra, and she isn't really wearing anything in any of those pictures that aren't garment friendly. My tbm wife wears them that low and unless she bends over you can't see them.
...I searched a lot of photos of her and I'd say 99% of here outfits are perfectly garmmie- and LDS-friendly. (Well, some folks will complain she wears trousers too much.) Of course, garment-friendly clothing doesn't mean there are necessarily garments underneath.