Posted by:
cludgie
(
)
Date: April 25, 2012 09:07AM
We needed a thread about grits yesterday, and I'm afraid in not doing so we may have alienated or offended forbiddencokedrinker. Brethren and Cistern, I will not have that. We SHOULD talk about grits, even if it's always so difficult to do so. The subject just lingers out there in a sort of culinary limbo and no one talks about it. Ah, we know what we're all thinking, to be sure. But people are loathe to speak of the subject of grits due to its inherently difficult and often terrifying and embarrassing nature.
I was raised in Southern California. You don't eat grits there. The thought "makes reason stare," as Eliza R. Snow once quipped when asked about grits. But when I was in my 20s, I joined the military and went to far off exotic places, like West Texas. When I sampled their exotic cuisine, I was introduced to grits for breakfast. I thought, "What a hair-brained idea, to eat ground lye-treated hominy with eggs and bacon." But they also introduced to me the even more exotic "ranch-style egg," where you cook the egg by flipping an inch of hot bacon grease over the top of it until it is done, while keeping the yolk runny. I found that the buttered, salted, and adequately peppered grits mixed well with the egg yolk and that they went down, as they say in West Texas, "reel gud."
So the part that everyone is always loathe to speak about--a subject that we should broach today--is just how one should be punished for eating their grits in an unorthodox way, with, say, sugar instead of salt, pepper, and butter. Should these individuals be hanged? Should they be beaten about the head? Horse-whipped, perhaps? With a real horse?
For the sake of forbiddencokedrinker, let's make this a real discussion that will not allow him or possibly her (I actually forget) to go away dejected and offended.