No, it's not from Kolob and it doesn't have a crystal skull:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/alien-skeleton-chile-mystery-human-mutant-why-solved-scientists-atacama-desert-stanford-a8268986.html

And reformed egyptian is deformed english.

The poor dear child should be buried decently.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/23/2018 11:32AM by stellam.

The vagaries of fame.

I was hoping for an alien.

Oh well.

Hopefully, scientists can tell us what they discover about the Nasca mummies in Peru (3 fingered mummies).

There has been some remote viewing of these and it would be interesting to see what 'science' says about these versus what the remote viewing team had to say.

I wish RV work was done on the one in question but I can't find any.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/23/2018 12:53PM by spiritist.

Right now no scientist is allowed to investigate them. Which tells me all I need to know.

I read the article and read a lot of 'believes', 'appear to be', 'could have', etc. etc.

Hardly something anyone with a 'scientific background' could be pleased with.

Where is the dna sample results, ct scans, bone sample results, etc. where is anything scientific except the aging that was critiqued???

Even though the comments by the 'Russian' were close to accurate based on RV, he was discredited as far as who he was and what his credentials were not based on any 'scientific facts'.

Like I say the remote viewing community has viewed this site and have come up with something other than a hoax!!! So I am interested in reading 'actual' scientific 'facts' on this.

I saw some of the RV work and it looks pretty good. I as an RV person, have questioned other RV work by this group because based on my review I believe they had misinterpreted some of the RV data they obtained but the overall project was right on target! He did respond to my challenges which is more than I expected.

The RV work I saw looked pretty good but I didn't see everyone's work. The only other concern with this group is I am not sure I like 'who' summarizes the work and how he reports it. I am not sure he is 'fair and unbiased' when it comes to his work versus other team members work.

Based on Utube 5 mo ago DNA was 'Human'.

Based on Utube 3 mo ago DNA was 'not' human. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHDhNyq5xIc

Sounds to me like 'science' needs to get their act together!!!



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/23/2018 11:34PM by spiritist.

What the heck is a "foetus"?

Delivering a foetus is what labour is all about.

That is the British spelling of a fetus.

That's what I was trying to indicate when I used "foetus" and "labour" in the same sentence above.

Whoosh!

"Despite its tiny stature the bone development of the skeleton matches that of a six year old child."

The skeleton is 6 inches long.

I'm not sure how those two statements fit together