Posted by:
spiritist
(
)
Date: March 23, 2018 05:02PM
I read the article and read a lot of 'believes', 'appear to be', 'could have', etc. etc.
Hardly something anyone with a 'scientific background' could be pleased with.
Where is the dna sample results, ct scans, bone sample results, etc. where is anything scientific except the aging that was critiqued???
Even though the comments by the 'Russian' were close to accurate based on RV, he was discredited as far as who he was and what his credentials were not based on any 'scientific facts'.
Like I say the remote viewing community has viewed this site and have come up with something other than a hoax!!! So I am interested in reading 'actual' scientific 'facts' on this.
I saw some of the RV work and it looks pretty good. I as an RV person, have questioned other RV work by this group because based on my review I believe they had misinterpreted some of the RV data they obtained but the overall project was right on target! He did respond to my challenges which is more than I expected.
The RV work I saw looked pretty good but I didn't see everyone's work. The only other concern with this group is I am not sure I like 'who' summarizes the work and how he reports it. I am not sure he is 'fair and unbiased' when it comes to his work versus other team members work.
Based on Utube 5 mo ago DNA was 'Human'.
Based on Utube 3 mo ago DNA was 'not' human.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHDhNyq5xIcSounds to me like 'science' needs to get their act together!!!
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/23/2018 11:34PM by spiritist.